Important note about SSL VPN compatibility for 20.0 MR1 with EoL SFOS versions and UTM9 OS. Learn more in the release notes.

This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Real Bandwidth usage - Control Center which one is correct?

Hi All,

After years of XG usage, I still cannot understand in the CC which graph is the correct one. I only have one user role and look at the graphs that CC reports:

Looking at the command line output:

system diagnostics utilities bandwidth-monitor

it reports like "bandwidth graph". I have a 100Mb at home and I never reach more than 8 Mb behind XG. Yes I know about IPS, Web Proxy and Anti-malware scanning but graphs are not reporting correct information at all. This is the feeling I have.

What about other guys on Community?

Regards



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • Hi Luk,

    I only rely on the graphs shown in Diagnostics -> System Graphs, they are pretty accurate.

    Also, I feel that the bandwidth graphs in the CC are in BYTES when we are used to mesure bandwidth in BITS. So, when you should see 100 Mb, you will see only 12 MB (with uppercase B).

    Example :

    81Mbps at 17:01

     

    10.03 MBps at 17:01, which is consistent

     

    Regarding the "Active Firewall Rules" graph, I really don't understand it.

  • I would love to have more accurate representation of current/past bandwidth.  All the reports collapse and average which is not useful.

    Other firewalls provide much more detailed information.

  • Another twist in these strange screen displays. Recently I had IPv6 enabled with 3 rules, two carried traffic. I started to see blue and green values in the graph, quite large values, considering the bandwidth I have access to.

    Billybob commented about the graph showing the total traffic used by rules, well yesterday I was running large transfers of data through the wifi to the lan and nothing showed.

    Ian

    XG115W - v20.0.3 MR-3 - Home

    XG on VM 8 - v21 GA

    If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.

  • No one from Sophos had a look at this thread and added a comment.

    Unbeliavable! Control Center and Live Connections are just useless.

  • I was told 2021 they will make changes to the reporting, and graphs.  But they said that back in a 2016 post and nothing has been done.  

  • Even my cheap home ASUS router shows very accurate realtime bandwidth per connected user (IP). Can't seem to find similar reporting in XG. Hard to find the bandwidth hogs.

  • Hello Arie,

    We have checked with the latest firmware and able to observe improvements since then. The valid Shown will be in KiloBytes instead of KiloBits. You are transfering through the firewall it will show the traffic utilization and also you can verify them in the system graphs.

    Regards,

    Aditya Patel
    Global Escalation Support Engineer | Sophos Technical Support

    Knowledge Base  |  @SophosSupport | Sign up for SMS Alerts
    If a post solves your question use the 'This helped me' link.

  • Hi Good day!

     

    Ever since I upgrade my Sophos XG 125 to v17.5.1 MR-1 and 17.5.3 MR-3, the web activity graph always stops after 5 to 7 days. I also notice that loading of information in dashboard becomes slow unlike previous firmware.

     

    Please see attached file for reference.

     

    Thanks.

     

    Val

Reply
  • Hi Good day!

     

    Ever since I upgrade my Sophos XG 125 to v17.5.1 MR-1 and 17.5.3 MR-3, the web activity graph always stops after 5 to 7 days. I also notice that loading of information in dashboard becomes slow unlike previous firmware.

     

    Please see attached file for reference.

     

    Thanks.

     

    Val

Children