Important note about SSL VPN compatibility for 20.0 MR1 with EoL SFOS versions and UTM9 OS. Learn more in the release notes.

WAN Link Load Balancing in v20

What is everyone's experience with WAN link load balancing in v20? We're a K12 private school with two identical WAN links from different ISPs, Frontier and Comcast. Our goal is to enable WAN link load balancing in an active-active config, weight 1 and 1.

Sophos support claims that the sessions are load balanced and shouldn't cause an issue with students being constantly moved from one ISP to the other. If they were, then this could cause issues with applications staying logged-in.

Has anyone had any success stories in schools using WAN link load balancing? Did it work differently in v19 than in v20? Is it much improved?



Added TAGs
[edited by: Raphael Alganes at 1:49 PM (GMT -7) on 17 Oct 2024]
Parents Reply
  • Hello Nathan,

    I believe, we all understood it correctly. 

    Sophos (Community/Ticket), providing an information that session persistent will route the traffic of that session completely via the service provider through which session is established. We are not denying to use the session persistence, this is most effective method for the load-balance hence the traffic which is related any banking or exam does not breaks in between (Round robin, it may route via different public IP and session may break). Also the recommendation was suggested as you mentioned online exams.

    As the traffic load-balance takes place based on session, we may notice minor difference in Internet usage of both the service providers. However, it will not have much difference in the usage.

    Now, it is up to the customer which algorithm suits your requirement. You can opt that. 

    Mayur Makvana
    Technical Account Manager | Global Customer Experience

    Sophos Support Videos | Knowledge Base  |  @SophosSupport | Sign up for SMS Alerts |
    If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.

Children