Connecting RED's to XG when using BGP

Hi MichaelBolton 

As per the information provided you want to configure RED device and XG firewall connectivity using BGP, please correct me.

Yes, I want the RED's to connect back to one of the IP's on our /22 public block that will be routed via BGP.

Hi MichaelBolton 

RED device does not have such BGP configuration module available, please refer to the article for RED device configuration.

The article covers all the required details for setup and troubleshooting steps- https://community.sophos.com/kb/en-us/126454

Hi MichaelBolton 

RED device does not have such BGP configuration module available, please refer to the article for RED device configuration.

The article covers all the required details for setup and troubleshooting steps- https://community.sophos.com/kb/en-us/126454

I don't think you are understanding what I am asking.

We don't have a WAN port because we are using BGP to 2 different ISP's. I have a /22 block of IP's that we advertise to both carriers. Internet is working fine. If I tried to deploy a RED to one of the IP's from our static block, it does not connect.

The XG's service ports are not listening on that block of IP's.

Hi MichaelBolton 

Please allow me some time to check for you, we will inform you further.

Hi MichaelBolton,

Please provide the below information.

1. RED device model number

2. How RED device getting Internet? (To fetch configuration file)

3. Network Diagram to understand the setup

RED device uses below Ports to communicate

RED hardware Ports

RED 10TCP 3400 + UDP 3400

RED 15TCP 3400 + UDP 3410

RED 50TCP 3400 + UDP 3410

The RED devices are at different locations. Some use static IP's, some use DHCP.

I don't really understand the need for a network diagram. It is a very simple setup. A Sophos XG multihomed to 2 ISP's using BGP.

Here is a Cisco doc that has a diagram. This is a very standard setup in enterprise networks.

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/23675-27.html

So you do not have a WAN Interface only the eBGP Interface? 

Many services relies on the WAN Interface (Interface with Zone WAN). I know, you are not able to configure the WAN Interface, because you are getting all routes from your ISP. 

There is no "Quick and dirty" Solution right now.

As far as i know, you can basically build a Dummy Interface on your XG with zone WAN and use a business application rule (NAT) to route the traffic Port 3400 and Port 3410 to this interface. 

BTW: RED should be open on all ports. Did you check, if you can connect via nmap to port 3410 to your ISP WAN IP? 

Yes, that is correct. BGP doesn't use a WAN interface. I just have a point to point link to each providers edge router.

I will try the dummy interface and see what happens.

All ports are open. The XG is just not listening on those IP's because they are not tied to an interface, just routed. I am guessing all of the services will suffer from this as well. Like SSL VPN, VPN, etc..

There are only IPsec+WAF as a use case issue in this setup. 

IPsec can only use a WAN Interface as SA. 

So you cannot build up a Site to Site in this setup.

RED should be open on all Ports (Port 3400 and 3410).

SSLVPN can be activated on their own Zone (So no binding to WAN). 

With V18, you can actually DNAT /NAT this traffic to another Port to get this up and running again. 

There is no zone. The interface is a point to point link. Our block of IP's are NOT on any interface.

DNAT does not work for SSLVPN. I have not tested the RED service yet.

You must have a Interface in any Case. How should this work otherwise? 

eBGP relies on having any kind of Interface with any kind of IP. 

Its most likely a DMZ Zone interface or a self created Zone. 

Or which IP do you setup on your Interface? A point to Point link to the ISP is still a valid IP on your Interface. So you can actually use this IP on your SSLVPN configuration as overwrite hostname and you can still use this Zone on this Interface to setup SSLVPN.