Sophos Email customers using IP-based mailflow rule connectors must migrate to certificate-based configuration by March 31st. To see if you're affected Click Here.

This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

no Option for disabling welcome E-Mails for access to self service portal

Dear Sophos,

it would be great, if there woulud be an option for disabling welcome emails to new email mailboxes/users. And of course it would be great too, when we were able deciding ourselves sending out welcome emails when enabling self service option globally. A language Option or editor for the welcome emails would also be really nice feature.

We are using SSO/Azure AD for Login to Self Service Portal, hence there is no need for our staff setting up a password. The welcome email just confuses our staff and generates a lot of incidents in our ticketing system.

thx a lot in advance.

Regards

Peter



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents Reply
  • now i know again, we already tried that, and it was not working.

    the admin users are not mail enabled, and with azure/sso you need to enter the main email address first on sophos id page. even when using upn login, after hitting sso you have to enter the upn.

    but you are right i can use the second option as well, because sophos automatically creates a custom sign in rule then for the admin accounts:

Children
  • Mail enable the accounts then. You seem to be coming up with reasons not to make it work, which is fine, but the system is what the system is. Sophos aren't going to change it any time soon, so you simply need to change things to work the way it's designed. Yep, sure, it could be better, but it isn't.

  • haha very funny and you think everyone is always good enough to go with the regular standard options or accepting every workaround, just because it is the easy way? Sure i could mail enable them, but i dont want to spend the licenses for that, just because its easier. When i always accept the easy way, nothing will change. Sophos needs to care about customers again, what they want and not what sophos wants. We are using a lot of sophos products and spending a lot of money year by year, hence its legit for me to say no to workarounds from time to time.

  • There's no cost for licenses. Mail enable them, make them shared mailboxes, then de-license them. No point preaching to me about what Sophos should do, I don't work for Sophos. I'm just a user like you and trying my best to help you out. If you don't want help and instead prefer to *** and complain at me, I'll leave you to your own devices. Good luck.

  • another set of workarounds.... shared mailboxes / accounts have to stay disabled, otherwise they count as a regular user and they will sync to sophos, which uses an email license then as well. 

    i am just telling, that i am not a fan of workarounds, and we are not able using the regular standard way in some cases, like you. It also seems you got me totally wrong, i just repeated your statement regarding customer care and sophos, i am not preaching, complaing or whatever you think at you, its a regular technical discussion not more or less.

  • Shared mailboxes do not have to stay disabled. You can theoretically create an O365 tenant, license one user and create 200 "shared mailboxes" all with their own username/passwords. They operate just the same as a standard user does. You can add them all to a phone or Outlook using the un/pw you set. Test it out. And it doesn't matter if they sync to Sophos. Mailboxes (shared or otherwise) only get assigned a license by Sophos if they receive an email, which in your case they won't. Licenses are also released by Sophos if a mailbox doesn't receive an email for 30 days.

    Sophos won't change - as you've admitted, they never implement customer suggestions - so you either have to find a way to work with the system, or choose another product.