Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Replies 1 reply
  • Subscribers 16 subscribers
  • Views 87 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested

ZTNA Gateway on alternate Hypervisor

Gord Hynes1

Hey all,

We're using ZTNA wherever we can, normally with Sophos firewalls. Works great. We have one situation where we're hosting servers for clients, so we need to use the VM gateway as only one tenant can use the firewall. We have had mixed results on the VM coming online properly. Though I'm working with support on it, I figured I'd ask here...

Has anyone reliably setup VMs in Proxmox to communicate? I have one online (on some beefy stuff) and a couple have worked *sort of* elsewhere. I have others that are basically just a NUC with Proxmox on it hosting the VMs. These ones seem to get stuck waiting on the K3s service to start. but if I backup and restore the same VM with the same ISO, it works. All in Proxmox.

Weird.

Parents
  • 0

    Update. Though the Proxmox side might remain a question to deal with... the same issue and version (2.1.1) are present on Hyper-V as well. moving back to a 2.0.2 image allowed it to boot and be approved in Central. 

    To clarify, this means to me that it's *not* the Hypervisor being trouble, but the VM. I've sent back to support to have them investigate.

    Case 01996097 for anyone at Sophos that might be curious on this.

    cheers!

Reply
  • 0

    Update. Though the Proxmox side might remain a question to deal with... the same issue and version (2.1.1) are present on Hyper-V as well. moving back to a 2.0.2 image allowed it to boot and be approved in Central. 

    To clarify, this means to me that it's *not* the Hypervisor being trouble, but the VM. I've sent back to support to have them investigate.

    Case 01996097 for anyone at Sophos that might be curious on this.

    cheers!

Children
No Data
Unfiltered HTML