Thread Info
  • State Verified Answer
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 17 subscribers
  • Views 4292 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Low throughtput on Agent-based resources compared to Agentless.

Prism

Hello!

While doing a basic HTTP speedtest you can see the throughput of the Agent-based resources is considerably low compared to an Agentless resource. Is there a reason for that?

Latency and bandwidth aren't an issue since both tests were done over local network through a local ZTNA gateway. (I'm using a ZTNA ESXi Gateway on Proxmox, not ZTNAaaS.)

This is something I've noticed while doing some heavy file transfers over SSH - and moving some data over HTTP too.

It seems the bandwidth is limited to around ~200Mbit/s for Agent-based resources, indifferent if its TCP or UDP resources.

Comparing SSH, while doing file transfers over Agent-resource the throughput never passes 200 Mbit/s, meanwhile on the same host I can get gigabit while connecting directly.

Thanks!



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • +1

    The question is, if you have the same performance with SSLVPN or other VPN services. 

    Overhead in VPN solutions are also impacting ZTNA and lower speed in that term. 

    Agentless will give you no overhead for encrypting the entire packet, its only the https part. 

    __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • 0 in reply to LuCar Toni
    LuCar Toni said:
    The question is, if you have the same performance with SSLVPN or other VPN services. 

    Using SSLVPN with Sophos Connect gives the same throughput (~200 Mbit/s)

    Meanwhile with OpenVPN Connect + DCO gives ~700 Mbit/s of throughput.

    I've gave 8 cores to the ZTNA VM, I'll do some testing now to see if it improves.

    Thanks for the answer!

    EDIT: Allocating more cores doesn't improve throughput, it seems a single connection can use only a single core.

    If a post solves your question use the 'Verify Answer' button.

    Ryzen 5600U + I226-V (KVM) v21 GA @ Home

    Sophos ZTNA (KVM) @ Home

Reply
  • 0 in reply to LuCar Toni
    LuCar Toni said:
    The question is, if you have the same performance with SSLVPN or other VPN services. 

    Using SSLVPN with Sophos Connect gives the same throughput (~200 Mbit/s)

    Meanwhile with OpenVPN Connect + DCO gives ~700 Mbit/s of throughput.

    I've gave 8 cores to the ZTNA VM, I'll do some testing now to see if it improves.

    Thanks for the answer!

    EDIT: Allocating more cores doesn't improve throughput, it seems a single connection can use only a single core.

    If a post solves your question use the 'Verify Answer' button.

    Ryzen 5600U + I226-V (KVM) v21 GA @ Home

    Sophos ZTNA (KVM) @ Home

Children
No Data
Unfiltered HTML