Thread Info
  • State Verified Answer
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 0 subscribers
  • Views 15186 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Encrypted Email to Multiple Recipients and Encrypting All Outbound Email

taekwanleap

I have 2 questions.

1.  What happens if a user sends an email to multiple email recipients they encrypt?  Will each email recipient be allowed to create their own account to open/view the encrypted email?  Or does encrypted email need to be sent on a one-to-one basis?

2.  Can you set the ES100 to encrypt all outbound email whether it needs it or not?

Answers and advice appreciated especially on question 2.  Not saying I would do this but was curious.


Thanks!

:36131


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0

    We are currently use SPX encryption not TLS.

    I should have clarified that in my original post.

    So if I send an encrypted email using SPX encryption to multiple recipients - what happens?  Will the appliance send a separate registration link to each email recipient?  Or does sending an SPX encrypted email need to be a one-to-one ratio?

    And, can you encrypt all outbound email using a rule or policy on the appliance where SPX encryption gets applied to all outbound email?  Again, not saying I would do this but curious if it could be done and thoughts about it.

    :36135
Reply
  • 0

    We are currently use SPX encryption not TLS.

    I should have clarified that in my original post.

    So if I send an encrypted email using SPX encryption to multiple recipients - what happens?  Will the appliance send a separate registration link to each email recipient?  Or does sending an SPX encrypted email need to be a one-to-one ratio?

    And, can you encrypt all outbound email using a rule or policy on the appliance where SPX encryption gets applied to all outbound email?  Again, not saying I would do this but curious if it could be done and thoughts about it.

    :36135
Children
No Data
Unfiltered HTML