I have a weird one.
We have 2 UTMs, both running 9.705-3 doing WAF for Exchange Server deployed per the KB - https://support.sophos.com/support/s/article/KB-000038003?language=en_US
Everything is working fine, but we are renewing our annual security test including a PenTestOne of these is showing as vulnerable to clickjacking and one is not
I have gone through the config side by side and both look identical, i cant figure it out.
The links offered up by the PenTest software are:
But i can't find a way to insert these headers.
If i test with https://www.lookout.net/test/clickjack.html one does load the page (which it shouldn't) and one does not load the page denying the connection (which should be the behaviour) so something isn't set correctly, its just where to change it
Can anyone shove me in the right direction?
Ok, found it after stitching together multiple other threads on the topic.
Firstly: THIS IS NOT A SUPPORTED CONFIG FROM SOPHOS. YOU DO SO AT YOUR OWN RISK. Secondly: THIS IS NOT A SUPPORTED CONFIG. You…
Ok, so I completely pulled this apart over the last 24 hours and worked out that i was / the tool I'm using is wrong.
BOTH are vulnerable to clickjacking and found a better tool to actually test it https://clickjacker.io/
So I'm back at square one which is that I need the WAF module to be able to inject one of those options in the headers. The login form will offer some limited protection to one of our applications but we have a couple things that pass to embedded webservers that we can't modify
So I guess this comes down to how can we do custom apache config to add those headers at the CLI through an inclusions line? There is a good summary of fixes here https://clickjacker.io/how-to-fix-clickjacking
Or if anyone has any other ideas I would really appreciate them
Firstly: THIS IS NOT A SUPPORTED CONFIG FROM SOPHOS. YOU DO SO AT YOUR OWN RISK. Secondly: THIS IS NOT A SUPPORTED CONFIG. You will be making backend changes and if you don't know what you are doing, bail out nowThirdly: It is likely to be reset upon a webUI change, firmware upgrade or reboot of the device. You will need to recheck on both of these conditions to ensure it remains in place
Also, just because you patch the Sophos unit doesn't solve your issue. These headers also need to be set on the backend servers (aka the "real webservers").
Take a backup of your ENTIRE config before proceeding.
Edit: /var/storage/chroot-reverseproxy/usr/apache/conf/reverseproxy.conf Under each VHost you want to fix, find this line: RequestHeader set X-Forwarded-Proto https
Directly under that line without amending it, add these lines:Header always set X-Frame-Options "DENY"Header always set Content-Security-Policy "frame-ancestors 'none'"
Save the file
Restart the service by running: /var/mdw/scripts/reverseproxy restart
You can also insert the lines to /var/storage/chroot-reverseproxy/usr/apache/conf/httpd.conf to do global protection if you were so keen.
Retest your config to ensure everything works as expected
Profit! / Go to the pub
Just realized you're new here. Your first thread and you have the class to share what you worked hard alone to discover.
Glad to have you here in the UTM Community!
Cheers - Bob