This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Multipath Rules vs Static Routing (Policy Routes) ?

Dear Experts,

We have 3x Internet access lines using Uplink Balancing.

We are using services for online file storage accessed by WebDAV (HTTPS) mostly.

I want do force all the traffic on HTTPS to destination i.e. "PROVIDER.com" to go over our dedicated line (same upload and download), let's call it "line1".

What is the best strategy in performance regarding the Astaro overload? And what is the difference in between?:

a) using Interfaces&Routing > Static Routing > Policy Rules (Any>Any>HTTPS>provider.com>interface "line1")

or

b) using Interfaces&Routing > Interfaces > Multipath Rules (Any>HTTPS>provider.com>line1)

Thank you in advance!
Uwe


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • Hi, Andre, and we're glad you have begun posting!

    I'm not certain that I understood your scenario, but if you want to use the web proxy to send one subnet's requests via ISP1 and the other subnet's via ISP2, then your only possible choice is Uplink Balancing with 'Itf. Persistance: by interface' Multipath rules.

    Cheers - Bob
     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
Reply
  • Hi, Andre, and we're glad you have begun posting!

    I'm not certain that I understood your scenario, but if you want to use the web proxy to send one subnet's requests via ISP1 and the other subnet's via ISP2, then your only possible choice is Uplink Balancing with 'Itf. Persistance: by interface' Multipath rules.

    Cheers - Bob
     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
Children
No Data