Any word on when a EAP 2 refresh 1 or EAP 3 will be out?
This random reboot and loss of connection is killing me .
Any word on when a EAP 2 refresh 1 or EAP 3 will be out?
This random reboot and loss of connection is killing me .
If a Sophos Dev could say the actual date, everyone would be very grateful for that.
I hope the performance of v18 will be better on EAP 3, at least reach the same level of v17.5.x.
If a post solves your question use the 'Verify Answer' button.
Ryzen 5600U + I226-V (KVM) v21 GA @ Home
Sophos ZTNA (KVM) @ Home
Any news about next release of SFOS v18?
Hi,
I would suspect after the webcast on the 17th.
Ian
XG115W - v20.0.2 MR-2 - Home
XG on VM 8 - v21 GA
If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.
I am still waiting for a real fix on DPI engine issue and authentication package for Catalina MacOS.
I guess the EAP3, instead, will be released, before the webinar.
You and me both.
Ian
XG115W - v20.0.2 MR-2 - Home
XG on VM 8 - v21 GA
If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.
Hi
Michael McCoy said:
Want to understand the "random reboot" issue you have been facing with EAP2. Please provide some more details around what you have experienced. Thank you very much for your feedback.
The next EAP - EAP3 - has been put to final test in our own production systems. In a positive path - it usually go through a week or 10 days of soaking before we release it to our community contributors. Stay tuned.
Catalina MacOS issue has been discussed here: https://community.sophos.com/products/xg-firewall/sfos-eap/sfos-v18-early-access-program/f/feedback-and-issues/115757/compatibility-caa---mac-catalina---bug
Indeed and unfortunately, DPI just do not work at all yet.
Paul Jr
Thanks PMParth. I hope you fix all the issues with DPI as some users are not able to use it as expected. I am one of the user.
FYI, I opened the thread on Catalina OS and worked with some devs to understand and share logs why the CAA does not work. Please keep going and improve performance on UI and web experience surfing.
Regards
At this point, I am not seeing any reason to run DPI instead of proxy. Don't want this thread to turn into DPI problems since we have other threads for that but proxy works so much better than DPI that it is not worth the headache even in a test environment. Also separate exception lists are just more overhead for admin to keep up with. I personally wouldn't use DPI until DPI Performance is clearly better than proxy and the exceptions lists etc. are more streamlined throughout the system.
I agree with Luk that the next release should focus more on polishing the system and eventually revisiting a GUI redesign in the near future where its easier to manage the workflow of the whole system instead of other new shiny functions that are not fully integrated yet.
Regards
Bill
Concur wholeheartedly with this.Billybob said:At this point, I am not seeing any reason to run DPI instead of proxy. Don't want this thread to turn into DPI problems since we have other threads for that but proxy works so much better than DPI that it is not worth the headache even in a test environment. Also separate exception lists are just more overhead for admin to keep up with. I personally wouldn't use DPI until DPI Performance is clearly better than proxy and the exceptions lists etc. are more streamlined throughout the system.
