Important note about SSL VPN compatibility for 20.0 MR1 with EoL SFOS versions and UTM9 OS. Learn more in the release notes.

This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Virtual Firewall Features - What do you think about it?

Zones are a new nice concepts because multiple interfaces can be grouped together. What I would like to see and get from Zones are Virtual Firewall concepts as other vendors have.


In some public tender, we are not able to suggest UTM because they explicit require virtual firewall (every vendor has different names and you know what I am talking about).

I think until Sophos will not provide this kind of functionality, they will never be able to fight on equal terms with other vendors.

What do you think about that?

Thanks to al.

Luk



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • lferrara said:

    In some public tender, we are not able to suggest UTM because they explicit require virtual firewall (every vendor has different names and you know what I am talking about).


    Technical documentation in public tenders are usually targeted to a specific vendor that was chosen by local IT team after testing several different solutions.

Reply
  • lferrara said:

    In some public tender, we are not able to suggest UTM because they explicit require virtual firewall (every vendor has different names and you know what I am talking about).


    Technical documentation in public tenders are usually targeted to a specific vendor that was chosen by local IT team after testing several different solutions.

Children
  • I do not agree with you, Vilic.
    Virtual Firewall was a feature introduced by one vendor many years ago, then other vendor followed their line and integrated virtual firewall in their solution. So Sophos should think about (they have zone now).
    At least there are 5 vendors that have this feature.

    Luk