Important note about SSL VPN compatibility for 20.0 MR1 with EoL SFOS versions and UTM9 OS. Learn more in the release notes.

This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Mailtransfer doesn't work (legacy mode)

Hello,

I need support with configuring mail traffic (SMTP) from external via noSpamProxy (DMZ) to the internal Exchange (LAN) and back again.

I have largely followed the Sophos instructions "Protect internal mail server in legacy mode" ( ( https://docs.sophos.com/nsg/sophos-firewall/20.0/help/en-us/webhelp/onlinehelp/AdministratorHelp/Email/HowToArticles/EmailProtectInternalMailServerLegacyMode/index.html ) but the mail flow doesn't really work - sometimes mails arrive from external sources, sometimes not... (e.g. when I have recreated the firewall and NAT rules). The same goes for mails from internal to external sources - it works like a bag of fleas - completely uncontrolled.

The following configuration:

WAN: Public IP
DMZ: noSpamProxy (10.0.1.10)
LAN: Exchange (192.168.200.15)

My settings on the Sophos XGS (20.0.2 MR-2 Build 378) are as follows:

Firewallrules

Otherwise, the other properties of the firewall rules remain unaffected, in particular no DPI or “Scan SMTP(s)” is not activated.

NAT-Rules

The Queues at noSpamProxy report: “The email server 192.168.200.15:25” refused the connection (email server = internal Exchange server)
The properties of the corresponding Receive-Connector (on the Exchange server) are configured as follows
The properties of the Send-Connector:
 
Thanks for reading and for supporting!


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
  • Hello Martin,
    I have never used the "legacy mode" before.
    I don't have such problems in MTA mode.
    What does the (mail) log on the XGS say?
    I would switch off the mail scan to test it. If it's OK then, you should open a support case with Sophos.


    Dirk

    Systema Gesellschaft für angewandte Datentechnik mbH  // Sophos Platinum Partner
    Sophos Solution Partner since 2003
    If a post solves your question, click the 'Verify Answer' link at this post.

  • Hi Dirk,

    Thanks for your Input! I’ve managed to solve the problem, and it turns out that at least the "Reflexive NAT-Rule" wasn’t necessary. Everything is running smoothly now. ;-)

    Bye
    Martin