Important note about SSL VPN compatibility for 20.0 MR1 with EoL SFOS versions and UTM9 OS. Learn more in the release notes.

Thread Info
  • State Suggested Answer
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 14 replies
  • Answers 3 answers
  • Subscribers 41 subscribers
  • Views 2616 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Using with ONE LAN interface GATEWAY

forum-astaro-org

Hello,

I try@home to migrate from UTM zu SFOS. On the good old UTM there was only one LAN Interface. This was the gateway for some PCs.

At the network configuration on the UTM, I configured the real-router-getway as gateway in this one UTM NIC. It has worked.

Now at SFOS I cant configure a gateway at the LAN (also only one NIC) interface.

What would be the 1:1 configuration for SFOS like the UTM was?

best regards

michael



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0

    SFOS follows the principle of Zones. So you can have one interface in one zone. 
    Do you use VLANs? If not, how did you use it with UTM ? Because this opens a lot of routing questions. 

    Essentially you can use it with VLANs easily. 

    If you have only one LAN interface without VLANs, you need to get the routing straight, which can be painful. 

    __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • 0 in reply to LuCar Toni

    Until now no VLANs.

    At UTM thats all:

    maybe the SFOS needed a LAN and WAN Interface.

  • 0 in reply to forum-astaro-org

    And how are you routing "on this firewall"? 
    Or whats your outcome here? 
    Because yeah, you can do this on SFOS too, and it will work. But how does a client interact with this firewall? Is the default GW for your client the 192.168.0.200? 
    Essentially: You can get this working on SFOS too, but not sure if this is really something worth following up. VLANs and a clean cut of interfaces are more applicable. 

    You would have to MASQ the traffic on the same subnet and send it weirdly in the network from a to b. 

    And you would do this by using a static route. Simply build a static route for 0.0.0.0 to the 192.168.0.25. 
    Do not forget the MASQ Rule. 

    __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • 0 in reply to LuCar Toni

    Thank you - I will try it.

    It seams the UTM needs NO gui-configured routing... it routed all to 192.168.0.25 only with the configured GW at NIC level.

    yes .200 is the default gw for some clients at home. Until now no vlan at home is needed - maybe the children will do some hacks at layer2-x level ...

    Also .200 is an 'exposed host' via german fritzbox; so I can .200 use with ssl vpn from external or do some NAT from external through the fritzbox.

Reply
  • 0 in reply to LuCar Toni

    Thank you - I will try it.

    It seams the UTM needs NO gui-configured routing... it routed all to 192.168.0.25 only with the configured GW at NIC level.

    yes .200 is the default gw for some clients at home. Until now no vlan at home is needed - maybe the children will do some hacks at layer2-x level ...

    Also .200 is an 'exposed host' via german fritzbox; so I can .200 use with ssl vpn from external or do some NAT from external through the fritzbox.

Children
  • 0 in reply to forum-astaro-org

    SFOS only allows a standard gateway to be placed on a WAN interface. Doing a WAN interface has other implications like device access acls and certain mechanism are not working. 
    Therefore its easy to work with a LAN zone and using 0.0.0.0 route to your GW instead. 

    __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Unfiltered HTML