3CX DLL-Sideloading attack: What you need to know

Thread Info
  • State Suggested Answer
  • +1 person also asked this people also asked this
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 72 replies
  • Answers 2 answers
  • Subscribers 47 subscribers
  • Views 21375 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

XG Firewall v18 MR-4: Feedback and experiences

LuCar Toni

New Thread to cover changes / feedback / experiences. 

"Old" MR3 Thread: https://community.sophos.com/xg-firewall/f/discussions/123403/xg-firewall-v18-mr-3-feedback-and-experiences

Release Notes: https://community.sophos.com/xg-firewall/b/blog/posts/xg-firewall-v18-mr4-is-now-available



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents Reply Children
  • 0 in reply to twister5800

    For XG Appliances, running in Active-Passive, we can accelerate more performance with the new fastpath technology. You should see more performance throughput on XGs running in Active-Passive. 

    The HA Setup process is improved, hence it will show more information, if the setup process missed something and failed. Instead of showing "Failed", it shows more information, what caused the failed setup process. Also the upgrade shows more alert in case of failure. 

    __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • 0 in reply to LuCar Toni

    Thanks for the quick reply :-)

    -----

    Best regards
    Martin

    Sophos XGS 2100 @ Home | Sophos v19 Architect

Unfiltered HTML