Important note about SSL VPN compatibility for 20.0 MR1 with EoL SFOS versions and UTM9 OS. Learn more in the release notes.
Hello
I got a XG firewall and after I saw wierd traffic coming from a browser I added a firewall rule to block the suspicous traffic. Although the traffic still flow, it does not care about the rule. How does that can be?
The rule is added on top, and there is no other interference. I succesfully operate this firewall with all other rules working. I just cant believe that.
Well it has been long time ago. But now I just ran another time in an issue with a firewall rule not working. Now I can provide full infos on this one:
By using synchronized app control, I block pingsender.exe for example:
But this guy still makes it through, by the firewall rule which allows outgoing traffic with an applied application rule, which should block pingsender.exe.
Well it has been long time ago. But now I just ran another time in an issue with a firewall rule not working. Now I can provide full infos on this one:
By using synchronized app control, I block pingsender.exe for example:
But this guy still makes it through, by the firewall rule which allows outgoing traffic with an applied application rule, which should block pingsender.exe.
The Diagnostic section -> Live activites lists pingsender, so its recoginzed, but still allowed somehow:
Additonally, The synchronized app controls works in other cases. It blocks the apps without issues, just this one here gets through for an unknown reasons. Thanks for your time.
sorry for this step-by-step answer. Just trying to provide all the necessary info.
App path is accurate, The same as in sychronized app control loads up as shown by Procmon (sysinternals).
Thanks for your time. I updated to version eighteen and now the issue has gone. Just got another question, for which I dont want to open a new thread:
Can you somehow stretch the window, all the scrolling is a bit annoying:
