Important note about SSL VPN compatibility for 20.0 MR1 with EoL SFOS versions and UTM9 OS. Learn more in the release notes.

Thread Info
  • State Suggested Answer
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 38 subscribers
  • Views 10376 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Clientless Group requiring email seems a bit strange

rfcat_vk

I tried to save a clientless IP address only to fail becasue I did not provide an IP address. This seems very strange to me a most clientless devices won't be assigned an e-mail address eg AP10, fileserver etc etc.

Ian



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    Hello Ian,

    We need the Email address to create a client-less address on the XG firewalls, Thank you for this feedback but there are certain instances where we create clientless users to actual end users and we may need to send the Quarantine Spam Digest to them, May be we should remove the Email as a mandatory parameter.


    PM is closely looking at this community and they will be registering this feedback


    Thanks,
    Kranthi
  • 0 in reply to Kranthi
    I would agree that removing the requirement for email is a good direction. I like using clientless devices to add perspective to reports, but don't want any emails to a real user generated. (Think appliances, etc.)

    Right now I have devices created with fake emails, and the quarantine digest disabled.
Reply
  • 0 in reply to Kranthi
    I would agree that removing the requirement for email is a good direction. I like using clientless devices to add perspective to reports, but don't want any emails to a real user generated. (Think appliances, etc.)

    Right now I have devices created with fake emails, and the quarantine digest disabled.
Children
Unfiltered HTML