Important note about SSL VPN compatibility for 20.0 MR1 with EoL SFOS versions and UTM9 OS. Learn more in the release notes.

This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Initial reactions to Sophos XG OS

Hey everyone, just want to start by saying THANK YOU Sophos for making this firewall available in the home use license form.  You've lost "0" revenue and gained a small army of experienced users who I'm sure recommend your product in their place of business because of the positive individual experience and comfort with the OS.

I downloaded the Sophos XG firewall ovf template and deployed to my home VMware cluster yesterday and spent a few hours thumbing through the interface.  I have some immediate thoughts and was curious as to what the community of users had to add.

1. Simple?  It sounds like development set out to make the firewall interface extremely simple.  Nothing more than 2 or 3 clicks away is one quote from a marketing video.  I would argue that the drive to make the product simple will alienate experienced administrators.  I'm not talking network engineers here, but it's pretty standard to have NAT and firewall policies separate.  This concept is widely used across fortigate, SonicWALL, and was beautifully executed in UTM9.  I admit that I didn't spend long, but I couldn't make sense of the firewall/NAT wizard in XG.  It appeared to go back to a home use port forwarding approach rather than the rich NAT/PAT capabilities of the UTM9.

Perhaps after a migration tool is available, it will allow us to convert more of our advanced UTM9 configs over and it will make more sense in action.  But from someone that has been configuring firewalls professionally for years, I felt this piece was done incorrectly.  Someone with experience should be able to configure standard NAT/PAT/firewall policies by clicking through the interface.

2. VLANS?  Why can't you provision an interface with VLAN tag without it already being provisioned and IP'd as untagged?  This works well in UTM9 and should be added to Sophos XG.  This forces you to set a bogus IP on the primary interface and tie to zone before you can add tagged interfaces using that hardware.

3. On prem mail server filter?  I couldn't get anywhere with this.  Simple settings like "the ip of your mail server", were nowhere to be found.  UTM9's Mail filter I was able to configure with AD integration and never a look at a manual.  Too simple guys!

What do you think community?  Other comments/input?  Curious to know if I'm alone on some of this.



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • i stated my opinion before and can only say that the Sophos XG is no firewall i would use, recommend to anyone and i can only hope that UTM 9 will stay us for a long time or they work some kind of heavy development miracle (and start listening to their userbase) and make XG a good replacement for UTM 9. I think they are "shooting themself in their knee" (sophos) to bring out a product like this because it will hurt their reputation if this gets sold and deployed in its current form since it reminds you more of a deep beta product than something that anyone would buy and use. I could critize the UI but thats just a part of it, lots of features are missing, they tried to "app simplify" but completly ignored what a firewall admin would want.

    ---

    Sophos UTM 9.3 Certified Engineer

Reply
  • i stated my opinion before and can only say that the Sophos XG is no firewall i would use, recommend to anyone and i can only hope that UTM 9 will stay us for a long time or they work some kind of heavy development miracle (and start listening to their userbase) and make XG a good replacement for UTM 9. I think they are "shooting themself in their knee" (sophos) to bring out a product like this because it will hurt their reputation if this gets sold and deployed in its current form since it reminds you more of a deep beta product than something that anyone would buy and use. I could critize the UI but thats just a part of it, lots of features are missing, they tried to "app simplify" but completly ignored what a firewall admin would want.

    ---

    Sophos UTM 9.3 Certified Engineer

Children
No Data