Many vendors (including Sophos) stopped publishing detailed information for a majority of the threats - understandably so. Much work and what would you need it for? To second-guess the scanner's results? The beast should have been found in time and blocked anyway so what's the use describing what could have happened if ...?
But in some areas the information is - for my taste - too sparse. Troj/FakeAle-NB has been blocked on a client, SEC is telling me (no more details, i.e. a path to a file, given). FakeAle sounds more like joke but the analysis offers no more insight. We do no have access to most of the clients (such is life at the university). Now the policy says: automatically clean up and otherwise deny access. First question is: why is a particular threat cleanable or why not. Second: if cleanable - why hasn't it been cleaned up (I know, sometimes a full scan is required - but sometimes it's in the analysis and sometimes not). Choosing Cleanup (if available) on Resolve alerts and errors ... most of the time results in timed out. More often than not the person you talk to has not very much knowledge and telling her where to look and what to look for is a feat. And directing them to Remove Trojans is not feasible solution.
Same problem with malware and suspiscious files. Cleaning with SEC is out of the question without more detailed information. Asking to user to send a sample ... see above (see also Send a sample).
Christian
This thread was automatically locked due to age.