Thread Info
  • State Verified Answer
  • +2 person also asked this people also asked this
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 18 replies
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 47 subscribers
  • Views 11947 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Sophos Firewall: v19.0 MR2: Feedback and experiences

LuCar Toni

Release Post:  Sophos Firewall OS v19.0 MR2 is Now Available 

Old v19.0 MR1 thread:  Sophos Firewall: v19.0 MR1: Feedback and experiences 

https://docs.sophos.com/releasenotes/output/en-us/nsg/sf_190_rn.html

Keep in Mind: V19.5 GA cannot be "downgraded to V19.0 MR2". 



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0

    So we had an interesting experience with an upgrade from 18.5.something to 19.0 MR2 at a customer site earlier this week; when we applied it none of the wifi (APX320, 740s, etc.) clients could connect; in the DHCP log (with the firewall providing DHCP for most of these) we saw constant lease activity on some test devices.  These are all wifi networks provisioned using the separate zone method.  As this needed to be working and in production, we rolled back to the old 18.5 firmware, and function returned.  Didn't have time for a support case, etc. but thank goodness for the rollback function!

    CTO, Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC

    https://www.convergesecurity.com

    Sophos Platinum Partner

    --------------------------------------

    Advice given as posted on this forum does not construe a support relationship or other relationship with Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC or its subsidiaries.  Use the advice given at your own risk.

Reply
  • 0

    So we had an interesting experience with an upgrade from 18.5.something to 19.0 MR2 at a customer site earlier this week; when we applied it none of the wifi (APX320, 740s, etc.) clients could connect; in the DHCP log (with the firewall providing DHCP for most of these) we saw constant lease activity on some test devices.  These are all wifi networks provisioned using the separate zone method.  As this needed to be working and in production, we rolled back to the old 18.5 firmware, and function returned.  Didn't have time for a support case, etc. but thank goodness for the rollback function!

    CTO, Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC

    https://www.convergesecurity.com

    Sophos Platinum Partner

    --------------------------------------

    Advice given as posted on this forum does not construe a support relationship or other relationship with Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC or its subsidiaries.  Use the advice given at your own risk.

Children
  • 0 in reply to BrucekConvergent

    Forgot to mention this was on XG hardware, not XGS.

    CTO, Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC

    https://www.convergesecurity.com

    Sophos Platinum Partner

    --------------------------------------

    Advice given as posted on this forum does not construe a support relationship or other relationship with Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC or its subsidiaries.  Use the advice given at your own risk.

  • 0 in reply to BrucekConvergent

    Ask Sophos about NC-114092 and try this workaround, i received this from sophos

    Workaround 1:

    If you are facing this issue then remove and re-add the affected separate zone SSID from AP/APX.

    Workaround 2:

    If you are facing this issue then restart the awed service. Please note that all the connected AP/APX will be disconnected and connected back.

    service awed:restart -ds nosync

  • 0 in reply to JuergenB

    Interesting, so a known issue.... We'll probably just wait until this is actually fixed.  Is it fixed in the recently released 19.5 MR2?

    CTO, Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC

    https://www.convergesecurity.com

    Sophos Platinum Partner

    --------------------------------------

    Advice given as posted on this forum does not construe a support relationship or other relationship with Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC or its subsidiaries.  Use the advice given at your own risk.

Unfiltered HTML