Newbie question here.
Currently i have my main network with IP 192.168.55.x.
My Ubiquiti PTP has 192.168.1.1 on Master and 192.168.1.2 on Slave.
And a remote network with ip 192.168.60.x that is receiving internet through the Sophos and through the PTP link.
The issue here is not the internet the i ssue is that when i search for that network on the sophos i see i am only receiving traffic with ip 192.168.1.1 and not the traffic from 192.168.60.x
I want to block some stuff and use Intrusion prevention and more tools from the Sophos but because on that Mikrotik we want to put more Vlans and block some services and website i can't do if i see only that network (192.168.1.1)
Hopefully i explained myself and you can help me with the problem.
Hi cx22x ,
Based on this understanding, it seems like the issue is that the Sophos is not seeing the traffic from the 192.168.60.x network. This could be due to a few reasons:
To troubleshoot this, I would suggest the following steps:
Thanks & Regards,
_______________________________________________________________
Vivek Jagad | Team Lead, Technical Support, Global Customer Experience
Log a Support Case | Sophos Service Guide
Best Practices – Support Case | Security Advisories
Compare Sophos next-gen Firewall | Fortune Favors the prepared
Sophos Community | Product Documentation | Sophos Techvids | SMS
If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.
Sorry if i not explained well, this is my network .
PTP master (192.168.1.1) is connected on Port 8 of the Sophos and Slave (192.168.1.2) is conected on port 1 of the Mikrotik
Network 192.168.60.x goes out to the internet without problem through the sophos , the problem is at the time we try to block websites or try to apply network rules to block traffic, on the sophos we only see traffic comes with ip 192.168.1.1 (PTP ip addres), instead of original 60,61,62 traffic.
On the Mikrotik i use nat masquerade but don't know if i have to use srcaddress or something like that or in the ptp.
Hopefully this helps to explain a little better the problem.
Thanks for replying.