Thread Info
  • State Verified Answer
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 0 subscribers
  • Views 8188 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Postgrey anyone?

mrdky

Hi Guys, just quick question on if anyone is using postgrey in conjuction with Puremessage.   Not sure if this would make puremessage more effective.  We are on 5.5.6 and still seeing a lot of spam.  Yes I know we are advised to upgrade to 5.6.0 but we don't see the need since the spam engine has not been upgraded.  And yes we are aware that this would not be supported by Sophos.

Thanks

:5378


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0

    After looking at this again, I am a little unsure of how this would be implemented since postgrey would listen to port 6000. and it looks like blockrd listens on port 4466.  I know this is off topic of support but if we put something like this in the postfix main.cf

    smtpd_client_restrictions = ignore_policy_error,

    check_policy_service inet:localhost:4466,

    check_policy_service inet:localhost:60000

    Would this work? In my mind it would go through blockrd then postgrey?

    Thanks

    :6573
Reply
  • 0

    After looking at this again, I am a little unsure of how this would be implemented since postgrey would listen to port 6000. and it looks like blockrd listens on port 4466.  I know this is off topic of support but if we put something like this in the postfix main.cf

    smtpd_client_restrictions = ignore_policy_error,

    check_policy_service inet:localhost:4466,

    check_policy_service inet:localhost:60000

    Would this work? In my mind it would go through blockrd then postgrey?

    Thanks

    :6573
Children
No Data
Unfiltered HTML