Thread Info
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 43 replies
  • Subscribers 31 subscribers
  • Views 63590 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

DO NOT INSTALL 9.352-6 or 9.318-5

BAlfson

See the thread "UTM Version 9.352-6 and 9.318-5 released"

Cheers - Bob



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
  • Yes, don't be a sucker like some of us that installed a pushed release that should have miserably failed QA testing prior to the push to UTMs.

    OPNSense 64-bit | Intel Xeon 4-core v3 1225 3.20Ghz
    16GB Memory | 500GB SSD HDD | ATT Fiber 1GB
    (Former Sophos UTM Veteran, Former XG Rookie)

  • this is now probably something i'd have catched @astaro.org before installing it -- i'm coming here every now and then because let's be honest -- convenient it's not (Yoda) -- too late...
  • in reply to Amodin
    think they dont have tested or the QA departement is in holidays...

    greets

    zaphod
    ___________________________________________

    Home: Zotac CI321 (8GB RAM / 120GB SSD)  with latest Sophos UTM
    Work: 2 SG430 Cluster / many other models like SG105/SG115/SG135/SG135w/...

  • Finally back online after suffering the nightmare having to re-register, something about moving userid which I thought I had done.

    I have 3 devices and you can't really do much too them without receiving backend errors.
    All are on 9.352-6.

    ian

    Ian,

    home UTM 9.x running in ESXi 6 e3-1275v2

    AP55c and AP10 (courtesy Astaro)

    Three other UTMs, SUM and SFM in hibernation

    XG 15.x MR3 in hibernation

  • Hi Guys,

    Thanks to Bob.
    Since the 9.3 debacle i´m really careful with installing new versions and use the wisdom of experienced Admins
    "if a new patch or firmware comes up, lay it beside, wait 6 weeks, then call support or Web for issues on it"

    So i do now.

    CU
    Thomas

  • could it be that 9.352-6 breaks the connection between a red 50 and the utm?
    It's stated as up but i can't reach any device in it and they can't reach the servers :/
  • in reply to neo243
    All my RED 50 customers has no problems....that I know of, I upgraded to 9.352-6 as it came out. (Mistakenly!)

    -----

    Best regards
    Martin

    Sophos XGS 2100 @ Home | Sophos v20 Technician

  • I had the problem with the RED device with some customers but not with 9.352. It was a general problem. Turn off and on the "redsX" Interface belonging to the RED. After that disable the RED. Wait arround 30 seconds (until the RED is offline) and turn it on again. In our case the route for the network belonging to the RED was missing on the UTM. After the mentioned steps the route was added.
  • in reply to zaphod
    zaphod,

    If that is the case, then DONT RELEASE SOMETHING.

    OPNSense 64-bit | Intel Xeon 4-core v3 1225 3.20Ghz
    16GB Memory | 500GB SSD HDD | ATT Fiber 1GB
    (Former Sophos UTM Veteran, Former XG Rookie)

  • Since Firmware version: 9.352-6 while logged into Webadmin interface i receive constantly the message 'backend connection failed'. Can i roll back the previous firmware?
Unfiltered HTML