Sophos UTM 9.510-4 released - let's share experiences!

Hi, thanks for reporting this issue and sorry for the inconvenience.

We replaced the update from 9.509 to 9.510 (http://ftp.astaro.de/UTM/v9/up2date/u2d-sys-9.509003-510005.tgz.gpg) and also uploaded the update for all who have installed the previous one (ftp.astaro.de/.../u2d-sys-9.510004-510005.tgz.gpg).

I updated the release notes at https://community.sophos.com/products/unified-threat-management/b/utm-blog/posts/utm-up2date-9-510-released accordingly.

Hi talex 

Thanks for this, as this up2date only contains:

Up2Date 9.510005 package description:

Remark:
 System will be rebooted

News:
 Hotfix Release

RPM packages contained:
 ep-webadmin-9.50-1416.gb92b94217.i686.rpm         
 chroot-smtp-9.50-24.gb41bc0f8.rb3.i686.rpm        
 ep-release-9.510-5.noarch.rpm                   

Is it only the "Mailmanager *bug*" that's fixed or have you fixed anything else?

the release contains two additional changes:

Hi!

Yesterday I have installed the hotfix without any issues.

Also the Verification with callout seems  to work fine now.
Anyone else also installed the hotfix (9.510-5) with success?

Thanks and regards!

Hi,

The TLS issue appears to be fixed.

Though 'resolver priming query complete' still visible in the 'DNS proxy' logs on my test system.

9.501-5 works fine! THX 4 the hotfix.

With 9.509, I had no problem with the User Portal.  With 9.510-5 on my lab UTM, when I login, my username and email address appear at the upper-right, but then it locks up and displays nothing more.  A reboot and a restore did not help.  Anyone else?

Cheers - Bob

I cant confirm this, UserPortal is working fine as before.

But i have another Issue, dont know if ist from this Version but my config: 

I have the Sophos behind a NAT Router in my Testing environement and would like to establish an IPSECL2TP VPN with preshared key. If i do this in the UTM i cant connnect. If i disable IPSEC in UTM and make 3 DNat Rules to a RAS Server in my Network, i can connect and IPSEC/L2TP works fine.

Can someone explain this to me?

Best Regards

I performed the update to 9.510-4 remotely (on my UTM at home), everything seemed to be fine, no issues noted.

Today I update to 9.510-5 remotely, and now the system is off-line and has been for well over an hour....

gonna have to look at this when I get back... :(

Different IPsec remote access servers have different levels of security.  The UTM's L2TP/IPsec implementation doesn't have the ability to "sign" encrypted packets with the public IP on your router, so your L2TP/IPsec client rejects those packets.

Cheers - Bob

Different IPsec remote access servers have different levels of security.  The UTM's L2TP/IPsec implementation doesn't have the ability to "sign" encrypted packets with the public IP on your router, so your L2TP/IPsec client rejects those packets.

Cheers - Bob