"Support access" and additional SSH ... why?

Support Access indeed enable SSH access.

Do you mean, that support asked you to enable SSH? 

Can you give us an reference? 

This is regarding your service request number 02017337.
 
Thnaks for your time over zoom session today.

As discussed we wre unable to access ssh to the firewall to check the logs and find the root cause of the issue, please let us know when we can have a session as we need to access it locally over ssh. 

I think they mean here that they want to control your laptop and SSH from inside your perimeter to the firewall. They've asked me in the past to do a screen-sharing session on my laptop with a particular piece of sharing software they like, and I always refuse that.

In my cases it has always been zoom for screen sharing.

Ian

Right, they've always recommended some program they want me to download. I refuse, of course. But we've found a different answer than screen sharing each time. If I _had_ to screenshare to literally show them something, as you say I'd use Zoom or maybe Google Meet that's more neutral would never involve allowing them to control anything.

P.S. On a totally different topic, I should be getting an XGS108 in the next couple of hours, so I'm not moving to the Big Leagues like you, but increasing my ports and RAM by 50% and gaining storage so I can debug (logs) and do some on-device reporting. I keep refreshing the FedEx page to see what's up.

yes, 123rescue.com - always demanding local firewall exceptions
but it works quite well

From my understanding 99% of the time the standard Support Access (tunnel) works, and gives support access to both WebAdmin and ssh (which is often used to look at debug logs).  However for some customers with complex network setups (for example if the Sophos Firewall is behind another firewall that restricts incoming access) it may be that the Support Access does not work.  In that case they may ask for an alternate way of accessing.

I went for the 118 because

1/. I got a good deal

2/. based on the 115's performanceI wanted something with a bit more grunt if I go back to the 1gb internet connection.

It does have way more ports than I need at the moment.

Ian

I went for the 118 because

1/. I got a good deal

2/. based on the 115's performanceI wanted something with a bit more grunt if I go back to the 1gb internet connection.

It does have way more ports than I need at the moment.

Ian

Yeah, I got a good deal on the 108 as well -- though it required 3 years XStream, which I've been doing a year at a time, but the deal's worth it -- and the 108 is probably well-sized for our use case. At any rate, won't get a storage-less device (87 or 88) ever again. Not worth the hassles of not having on-device, extended logging. On-device reporting's pretty cool as well.