Important note about SSL VPN compatibility for 20.0 MR1 with EoL SFOS versions and UTM9 OS. Learn more in the release notes.

Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 24 replies
  • Subscribers 44 subscribers
  • Views 36483 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Use Transparent Proxy or Non-Transparent Proxy?

Dwayne Parker

What do you recommend?

Using Transparent or Non-Transparent Proxy mode?

 

Thanks in advance:

 

 

Dwayne Parker



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0

    Hi,

     

    Depends on your network requirements and what clients are you using? 

    I´m using both because XG is offering both. PAC File with Standard proxy. 

    Mobile Devices with transparent. 

    Cheers

    __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • 0 in reply to LuCar Toni

    manbearpig said:

    Depends on your network requirements and what clients are you using? 

    What's the advantage for using non-transparent Proxy nowadays?

    I am maintaining some Setups using the Non-Transparent Proxy. There we often deal with issues connected to web-traffic which is not initiated by the browser but by applications. The origin of those problems often comes from those applications not beeing able to authenticate via NTLM or because these Applications are not able to get a propper Explicit-Proxy-Setting configured.

    Users can get rid of this when using transparent proxies what is a huge advantage in my eyes!

    Please send me Spam gueselkuebel@sg-utm.also-solutions.ch

  • 0 in reply to HuberChristian

    With transparent proxy you can apply Firewall rules based on FQDN. With traditional proxy you can't.

Reply Children
No Data
Unfiltered HTML