Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 23 replies
  • Subscribers 1 subscriber
  • Views 13760 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

WIFI separated

zero7
Hello,

I would like to ask you if it is possible to have 2 WIFI Networks separated. I mean, for the first network I want that all traffic is sent by the tunnel to UTM. For the second I want a WIFI guest just for internet and use the remote internet line, not UTM Tunnel.

Is that possible?

Thanks


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    Guys, the only way I guess this might work for zero7 would be for the AP 30 to be "bridged to the AP lan" with 'Client isolation: Disabled' and setup the RED as Split.  Even then, I'm not certain that "UTM APs connect to the UTM via a tunnel" doesn't override that and that the AP traffic doesn't have to go through the AP tunnel first.  I think it should work, though!

    Zero7, please let us know if this works with and without 'Client isolation: Disabled'...

    Cheers - Bob
     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
  • 0 in reply to BAlfson
    I selected separate zone for my guest wifi but it doesn't work. I didn't receive an IP from dhcp althought I configured it.

    Just to be clear, I don't want to use the tunnel and access to my networks on utm side. I just want to be able to use internet with remote internet line for guests.
Reply
  • 0 in reply to BAlfson
    I selected separate zone for my guest wifi but it doesn't work. I didn't receive an IP from dhcp althought I configured it.

    Just to be clear, I don't want to use the tunnel and access to my networks on utm side. I just want to be able to use internet with remote internet line for guests.
Children
Unfiltered HTML