This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

NAS External access

I have a File server name Synology, it has option to share files to external users, i tired to share the files but remote users not able to access it,

i have two Firewall in my Domain, one UTM version 9.711-5 another XG.

On XG i just created DNAT and allowed the fileserver to http and https access, this work fine and remote users have no issues.

But from UTM i did the same, i done creating rule for file server and allowed port 5000 and Dnat rule, but it not work.

Any suggestion would be appreciated

This thread was automatically locked due to age.

Parents

Jay Jay over 1 year ago

Opening up your file server to external (internet) access is not a good idea regardless of the port. Have your users connect to your network via vpn. I know for sure UTM supports this, and am pretty sure xg does too.

If you insist on allowing direct access, show a pic of your dnat rule. I assume the synology file server also has its own firewall, has external access been enabled there?
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
feroz syed over 1 year ago in reply to Jay Jay

Thanks for your reply, there is a built-in firewall enabled on NAS, also on NAS external access is enabled, now the issue is port 5001 on firewall, this port getting block byUTM.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
Jay Jay over 1 year ago in reply to feroz syed

I don't see any pics.

Please show pics of all relevant rules and definitions.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
feroz syed over 1 year ago in reply to Jay Jay
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
feroz syed over 1 year ago in reply to feroz syed
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
Jay Jay over 1 year ago in reply to feroz syed

Can you show more detail on the objects in red?

If you're forwarding port 5000, why is the service definition different for the destination compared to source? You want port 5000 (or 5001) on the wan side to be directed to the same on the lan?

Which specific object are you using for external? There's 3 different ones, all start with external (wan....)
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Reply

Jay Jay over 1 year ago in reply to feroz syed

Can you show more detail on the objects in red?

If you're forwarding port 5000, why is the service definition different for the destination compared to source? You want port 5000 (or 5001) on the wan side to be directed to the same on the lan?

Which specific object are you using for external? There's 3 different ones, all start with external (wan....)
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Children

No Data