Thread Info
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 4 subscribers
  • Views 10452 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

use 4g interface for IPSEC Tunnel alongside normal WAN interface, I want to route RDP traffic via the 4g interface on one UTM?

JohnKenny

I want to use a 4g interface that is connected to a 4g modem to connect to a remote site via IPSEC tunnel, I already have a normal ADSL based WAN connection so the 4g interface is to run along side that but just for this tunnel.

I have added the 4g interface and it says its up and running on the dashboard but, the IPSEC tunnel i created using the 4g int as the local connection interface isnt connecting. 

Why can I not get any traffic across the 4g int at all?  I didn't use the default gateway option as i dont need uplink balancing.  

How can I use this 4g int for certain jobs only?

Thanks



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • OK so i have the 4g int working now i enabled its DG, I have uplink balancing enabled. How do i now get different traffic to go across a separate IPSEC tunnel is it all via multipath? I am going to set up 2 IPSEC tunnels between 2 sites I want one tunnel to go across the standard WAN and the 2nd IPSEC tunnel to go across the 4g int but only for RDP traffic between the 2 sites. Whats the best way to achieve this? Do i use Multipath rules at both ends, what do i use connection based or interface based?

    Thanks

    JK

    CompKickers

  • in reply to JohnKenny
    Basically what am trying to achieve is to have RDP traffic between 2 UTM's go across the 4g int at one site as its upload is quicker that the WAN int.

    Can anyone advise on the best way to achieve this?

    JK

    CompKickers

Reply Children
No Data
Unfiltered HTML