This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

use 4g interface for IPSEC Tunnel alongside normal WAN interface, I want to route RDP traffic via the 4g interface on one UTM?

I want to use a 4g interface that is connected to a 4g modem to connect to a remote site via IPSEC tunnel, I already have a normal ADSL based WAN connection so the 4g interface is to run along side that but just for this tunnel.

I have added the 4g interface and it says its up and running on the dashboard but, the IPSEC tunnel i created using the 4g int as the local connection interface isnt connecting. 

Why can I not get any traffic across the 4g int at all?  I didn't use the default gateway option as i dont need uplink balancing.  

How can I use this 4g int for certain jobs only?

Thanks



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • OK so i have the 4g int working now i enabled its DG, I have uplink balancing enabled. How do i now get different traffic to go across a separate IPSEC tunnel is it all via multipath? I am going to set up 2 IPSEC tunnels between 2 sites I want one tunnel to go across the standard WAN and the 2nd IPSEC tunnel to go across the 4g int but only for RDP traffic between the 2 sites. Whats the best way to achieve this? Do i use Multipath rules at both ends, what do i use connection based or interface based?

    Thanks

    JK

    CompKickers

Reply
  • OK so i have the 4g int working now i enabled its DG, I have uplink balancing enabled. How do i now get different traffic to go across a separate IPSEC tunnel is it all via multipath? I am going to set up 2 IPSEC tunnels between 2 sites I want one tunnel to go across the standard WAN and the 2nd IPSEC tunnel to go across the 4g int but only for RDP traffic between the 2 sites. Whats the best way to achieve this? Do i use Multipath rules at both ends, what do i use connection based or interface based?

    Thanks

    JK

    CompKickers

Children