Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 5 replies
  • Subscribers 5 subscribers
  • Views 11001 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Utm 9 home edition setup

Karan Anand

Hi Guys

I am new to UTM's and trying to learn. I have installed UTM 9 on vmware workstation. Please guide me for network adapter settings. I've tried all the settings bt none of one worked for me. if i setup two network interfaces for my vm machine both at bridged mode then only I get access to Utm web admin page otherwise I get the same ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED error in chrome while accessing the UTM web admin page. If somehow I am able to access web admin page then it works only for internal network as the both adapters are in bridged mode so both are in the same subnet  so it become useless to use utm as I want to try web filtering features so that I can block some content at my home.

 

Cheers 

Karan



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0

    Hi, Karan, and welcome to the UTM Community!

    There is a problem with some versions of Chrome and UTM versions before 9.413, but you also have a routing problem.  See #3.1 in Rulz.

    Cheers - Bob

     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
  • 0 in reply to BAlfson

    how can i set masquerading rule for the newly added interface ? And how can I practically see whether my web filtering things is working or not ? Like i have created 2 VM's one is running windows 8 and other is running utm9 ? how can i access internet on Vm running windows so that i can get block message by utm ?

    cheers and thanks 

    karan

  • 0 in reply to Karan Anand

    I'm afraid I can't "see" your setup, Karan.  Here's a simple diagram of what I would expect to find:

    Internet<-->[bridged ISP modem]<--><146.56.66.103[UTM]172.20.1..1><-->LAN

     Please show a similar diagram for your topology.

    Cheers - Bob

     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
Reply
  • 0 in reply to Karan Anand

    I'm afraid I can't "see" your setup, Karan.  Here's a simple diagram of what I would expect to find:

    Internet<-->[bridged ISP modem]<--><146.56.66.103[UTM]172.20.1..1><-->LAN

     Please show a similar diagram for your topology.

    Cheers - Bob

     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
Children
  • 0 in reply to BAlfson

    Hi Bob

    In my case I have Lan working on 192.168.0.1-255

    and my wan ip is 10.0.x.x which is shown on my isp modem. Right

    Now, I have created a virtual machine under Vmware. I have added two virtual network interfaces which shows as the below screenshot.

    Then, If I set both interfaces in bridged mode.

    Now, see both the interfaces are on same subnet.

    Now guide me what needs to be done?

  • 0 in reply to Karan Anand

    WebAdmin and the Configuration Daemon automatically create routes between the IPs defined on the UTM's interfaces.  In this case, you have created a routing problem because 192.168.0.0/24 is defined on both interfaces. As I said above, see #3.1 in Rulz.

    If your External interface should connect directly to the modem, then it needs a 10.0.x.x IP with the modem's as the default gateway.  As my previous post implies, the preferred topology is to bridge the modem so that the UTM can have a public address on External and there is no double NAT.

    Cheers - Bob

     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
Unfiltered HTML