Hardware, Installation, Up2Date, Licensing Hystou fanless i5 with Dual Intel NIC

UTM Firewall requires membership for participation - click to join

Thread Info

State Not Answered
Locked Locked
Replies 8 replies
Subscribers 8 subscribers
Views 8788 views
Users 0 members are here

Options

Suggested

This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Hystou fanless i5 with Dual Intel NIC

harshw over 8 years ago

I came across this: http://www.aliexpress.com/store/product/Mini-PC-Windows-Core-i5-3317U-Mini-PC-Dual-LAN-2-Gigabit-LAN-Port-Mini-PC/228210_32683460702.html. It's a dual core Ivy Bridge with dual Intel LANs

I have a 180/20 Comcast cable connection and would like to deploy UTM 9 and have IPS enabled.

Does anyone have any experience with installing UTM on this? In theory it should work as it contains supported CPU and Intel NIC's

This thread was automatically locked due to age.

Parents

0 apijnappels over 8 years ago

No experience with this box, but the processor could be a bottleneck for your 180 Mbps connection in combination with IPS.

IPS is very, very CPU frequency intensive and the 3317U processor has a base of 1.7GHz with turbo speed of 2.6GHz both of which could be too low for IPS at this speed.

It will likely work, but your maximum throughput could decrease as a result of this.

Managing several Sophos firewalls both at work and at some home locations, dedicated to continuously improve IT-security and feeling well helping others with their IT-security challenges.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 harshw over 8 years ago in reply to apijnappels

Thanks apijnapples. I will go instead for something like this: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Intel-Gigabit-ET-Dual-Port-Server-Adapter-E1G42ETBLK-Card-E1G42ET/282143857594 combined with a AsRock H110 mITX http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813157678

I'm thinking of putting in the fastest i3 I can afford: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA1UH3Z96233

Hopefully this should be enough for the 180 Mbps connection.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Reply

0 harshw over 8 years ago in reply to apijnappels

Thanks apijnapples. I will go instead for something like this: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Intel-Gigabit-ET-Dual-Port-Server-Adapter-E1G42ETBLK-Card-E1G42ET/282143857594 combined with a AsRock H110 mITX http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813157678

I'm thinking of putting in the fastest i3 I can afford: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA1UH3Z96233

Hopefully this should be enough for the 180 Mbps connection.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Children

0 apijnappels over 8 years ago in reply to harshw

I believe this would be very good processor for your bandwidth combined with IPS.

Managing several Sophos firewalls both at work and at some home locations, dedicated to continuously improve IT-security and feeling well helping others with their IT-security challenges.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 rfcat_vk over 8 years ago in reply to harshw

I don't think the asrock h110 will work with UTM due to an issue with the HPET. It does work with the XG.

Ian

XG115W - v20.0.2 MR-2 - Home

XG on VM 8 - v21 GA

If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 harshw over 8 years ago in reply to rfcat_vk

So even if HPET is turned on in the BIOS, the 110/150 & 170 chipsets wont work with Sophos UTM? If so I might just go in for a Z97 or Q87 motherboard
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 rfcat_vk over 8 years ago in reply to harshw

From my experience you are correct.

ian

XG115W - v20.0.2 MR-2 - Home

XG on VM 8 - v21 GA

If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 VladimirChalnik over 7 years ago in reply to rfcat_vk

HI

Sorry, why motherboard with H110 or 150, UTM not work ?

our dont have other motherboard, like H81, H85...

there is a solution to these boards work ?
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel