Thread Info
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 43 replies
  • Subscribers 31 subscribers
  • Views 63583 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

DO NOT INSTALL 9.352-6 or 9.318-5

BAlfson

See the thread "UTM Version 9.352-6 and 9.318-5 released"

Cheers - Bob



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents Reply
  • in reply to BlueRue

    BlueRue said:

    All my executive reports now show like this:

    Anyone else run into this issue after updating to 9.352-6??

    Same issue here.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    Sophos UTM 9.719-3 - Home User
    Virtual machine on Dell Optiplex 3070
    i3-9100 @ 3.60 GHz, 16 GB RAM
    --------------------------------------------------------------------

Children
  • in reply to Jeff x
    I am not having that issue on 9.351-3 but as soon as I upgrade to 9.352-6 the reports don't show right.

    Home User on SG-115 Appliance
  • in reply to BlueRue

    BlueRue said:
    I am not having that issue on 9.351-3 but as soon as I upgrade to 9.352-6 the reports don't show right.

    Same for me. I think you saw "9.351-3" in my signature and thought I was referring to that version. I wasn't ;-)

    I've already reverted back to 9.351-3. No more issues.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    Sophos UTM 9.719-3 - Home User
    Virtual machine on Dell Optiplex 3070
    i3-9100 @ 3.60 GHz, 16 GB RAM
    --------------------------------------------------------------------

  • in reply to Jeff x
    All I get is a little blue box.

    More importantly when is Sophos going to release a fix for this?

    I don't get the backend issue if I don't use flow display.


    Ian

    Ian,

    home UTM 9.x running in ESXi 6 e3-1275v2

    AP55c and AP10 (courtesy Astaro)

    Three other UTMs, SUM and SFM in hibernation

    XG 15.x MR3 in hibernation

  • in reply to Jeff x
    Its evidently STILL a problem..
Unfiltered HTML