Improvement request - Still updating a firewall requires so much time

+1

Paul Jr

I know this doesn't add any further to your request but the system load of almost 100 percent per core is unsustainable in a production firewall. I was running system load over 3 on my test firewall in a vm with quad cores. Yes throwing newer, faster hardware will bring it down a little but the system load has increased significantly in v18 compared to v17 and my test lab had only one user mostly playing with the GUI.

Regards.

No Lucar. Small customers do not need CM. They use XG interface.

Is CM going to be the new UI even for XG in 18 or 18.5?

Regards

LuCar Toni, 

can you ask to some dev like Rana Sharma or someone else to look at this issue?

Thanks

The basic question is: Is it slower than V17? 

No!

The title of the thread is clear! In v18 no improvements have been done for speed-up Firewall editing UI.

In Addition, Lucar:

threads like this should not even been opened. Waiting 10-14 seconds after updating a firewall rule is a shame!

Sorry for posting. I am just a privat user like you. 

Just wanted to know, if there is a new issue with the V18 release, because the time to complete a task is kinda the same in V17 to V18, from my experience. 

Something i looking forward is CM. Central has some powerful UI. You will be fast in configuration and easily push this configuration to your XG. 

Hello All,

While i have found that the process of rule creation and updates takes 15+ seconds on the XG125 running either V17.5 or on my test V18 box, I know that on several customers XG310 units running V17.5 it is a lot faster.

While a few people have been using CM to make changes and are advising that the rule updates are faster, is this actually the case? is the CM GUI just more responsive because the changes to the actual firewall are being background tasked, and still taking 15+ seconds to complete, but because the CM is not instant access people are just not observing the time requirement.

Personally while my XG125 units in the field are slow at firewall edits and changes, I am not finding the GUI that unreasonable. If I was seeing that delay on the XG310's I think I would be more concerned. I also do not use anything smaller than a 125.

Regards

Gavin

Appreciated your opinion Luca. As I said, most smb will use only XG and nothing else.

Regards

Just my opinion: I would not agree with you Luk, because i assume, SMB customer would rather use more then one product (XG). Most likely Endpoint, mobile or something like that. So the story to use Central is not new to most customers. 

Lets stay on topic here: 

Personally speaking, i use a XG125 at home and rather rarely touch this box. So i did not even notice the UI performance at all.

Other boxes (XG450 and 230) are quite fast. 

My lab vmware appliances are quit (Uses the I7 of my workstation). 

If you access the webadmin of a CM managed EAP2 appliance, there will be a banner "Please do not change something on the Webadmin". 

Did you see this change? Did somebody test this and report some feedback about CM to the DEV Guys? They are looking for your Feedback! 

https://community.sophos.com/products/xg-firewall/sfos-eap/central-management-eap/ 

Hi,

I am running a 50/20mb/s link. If you think the management by the CFR is quick you must have a very fast connection and be close the server network speed wise.

Using my J1900 XG I decided the GUI was too slow and moved a more powerful box, well the CFR management is slower than the J1900.

Ian 

Hi,

I am running a 50/20mb/s link. If you think the management by the CFR is quick you must have a very fast connection and be close the server network speed wise.

Using my J1900 XG I decided the GUI was too slow and moved a more powerful box, well the CFR management is slower than the J1900.

Ian 

Thanks Ian for your feedback.