Thread Info
  • State Verified Answer
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 3 subscribers
  • Views 5053 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

SSL_ERROR_BAD_CERT_DOMAIN on http-Sites

Markus Quirmbach

Hi There!

I've found a peculiar behavior in our Sophos UTM 9.

We protect our webservers on which we host several customers with a UTM 9. Now let's say customer A has an SSL certificate and customer B doesn't.

We create a virtual webserver with the ssl certificate for customer A and set it to encrypted (HTTPS) & redirect. Then we create another virtual webserver for customer B but with plain http. Both virtual webservers route to the same real webserver.

Now the interesting part: When you open the website of customer b, everything works fine. But if you manually type https:// before the URL, say https://customerb.com, you get a SSL_ERROR_BAD_CERT_DOMAIN error (or similar, depending on browser). That in itself isn't that bad but if you click on advanced you can see the certificate of customer A! The message looks like this:

customerB.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is only valid for the following names: *.customerA.com, customerA.com

Error code: SSL_ERROR_BAD_CERT_DOMAIN

Naturally we don't want to let everyone see which other customers we host on that server.

Is there a way to prevent this? The real webserver is a Windows Server with IIS.

Thanks and kind regards,

  Markus



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • +1

    That's standard Apache behavior (WAF is based on Apache).

    If you have multiple IP addresses available you could host your HTTP-only customers from one IP address and your HTTPS customers from a second one.

  • 0 in reply to ewadie

    Hi ewadie, thanks for the reply!

    yes, we do have multiple IP addresses. But if we set different IPs for the customers we would have to change the IPs every time a http-only customer decides to suddenly have a ssl certificate as well (which is not that uncommon). That's a hassle. But we will consider your suggested approach. Thanks!

    Another idea: Is there a way to set the "standard" ssl certificate for a virtual webserver? So we could decide which certificate shows up in the error message? This would at least prevent everybody to see the certificate of another customer of us.

    Thanks for every help!

      Markus

Reply
  • 0 in reply to ewadie

    Hi ewadie, thanks for the reply!

    yes, we do have multiple IP addresses. But if we set different IPs for the customers we would have to change the IPs every time a http-only customer decides to suddenly have a ssl certificate as well (which is not that uncommon). That's a hassle. But we will consider your suggested approach. Thanks!

    Another idea: Is there a way to set the "standard" ssl certificate for a virtual webserver? So we could decide which certificate shows up in the error message? This would at least prevent everybody to see the certificate of another customer of us.

    Thanks for every help!

      Markus

Children
  • +1 in reply to Markus Quirmbach

    Markus Quirmbach said:
    Another idea: Is there a way to set the "standard" ssl certificate for a virtual webserver? So we could decide which certificate shows up in the error message? This would at least prevent everybody to see the certificate of another customer of us.

    Create a wildcard certificate in WebAdmin, clone the virtual webservers of your HTTP-only customers, switch the clones to HTTPS and select the wildcard certificate. Don't forget to enable the new virtual webservers. Accidental HTTPS requests to your HTTP-only customers will now use this wildcard certificate instead of a legitimate certificate of one of your HTTPS customers.

  • 0 in reply to ewadie

    Hey ewadie,

    I tried you suggestion and it works. Thanks a lot!

    Of course, giving the virtual http server its own IP address is still the better option, though. We will discuss this two approaches in our company.

    Regards

      Markus

Unfiltered HTML