This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Webproxy with AD SSO, non-domain clients login request without domain name in URL

Hello,


we have webproxy with AD SSO support active since a week now, it works fine for all AD clients.

For non-AD clients we want to get a login side for authentication. Actually it works this way except the little issue, that the url in that request comes without domain and the resolution fails in result.

Hostname has been set incl. domain i.e. fw.xxx.de

What can I do to fix that?

Best regards,

Daniel



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • By default authentication is done via the hostname.  This is because Internet Explorer will consider this an intranet site and be willing to do silent SSO to it.

    If you cannot resolve it on your clients (you are not using the UTM for dns) (and you don't want to add the domain name to automatic suffix) then you can get the UTM to use the FQDN instead.

    On the command line:

    cc set http adsso_redirect_use_hostname 0

    (set to 1 to turn it back on)

    This will not use the FQDN.  IE will now do password pop-ups because it thinks that some internet site is asking for your password.  To get rid of the prompt, in IE you can set the UTM fqdn as a Intranet site.  This can also be done via an AD push.  FF has a similar problem and again can be configured (network.negotiate-auth.trusted-uris)

  • The Situation is this.

    We have some locations connected via vpn, vpn HUB + UTM is located in a datacenter and the UTM serves as central firewall for about 30 differnt subnets.

    Now we have Proxy transparent mode + AD SSO enabled, works great as long as the client is in our Windows domain.

    So we don't speak about AD domain clients but about non-domain clients which cannot resolve UTM's hostname/netbios name while trying to hit UTM's authentication page.

    Now when a business partner comes to visit a department, connects I want to give them Internet access and here comes the issue.

    The browser shows only https://fxx-dxxx/IDxxxxxx

    The computer of the business partner gets an IP from the dhcp + nameserver of locations AD server, the AD server cannot resolve fxx-dxxx and the authentication process fails.

    As soon as an entry in computers local hosts file exist which points to the UTM, then the auth process works fine, becaues the pc can resolve the name. Second option is to add the local domain suffix in the network settings of the partner pc, it works also. Manipulating partner clients IE, FF, Chrome settings as well as hosts or network settings in order to have UTM netbios name in local zone is not an option because of legal rules.

    The problem could be fixed easily when the UTM would respond with the correct FQDN, which would be resolvable for non-domain clients.

    For Phones and Tablets it's the same situation, now we have set the authenticate option NONE...

    I don't understand why Sophos UTM gives out netbios names, although the AD intergration is active, this is a clear indicator that we have a domain environment which we have to handle by domain names. At least there should be an supported option to switch between.

    I will setup a testsystem tomorrow to test "cc set http adsso_redirect_use_hostname 0" option. Would the change breake the support contract?

    If somebody from Sophos support reads this, please tell my why UTM doesn't use FQDN for authentication of non-domain clients when AD integration is active? Is there any reason for this.

    Daniel

  • Daniel, this isn't a venue to have conversations with Sophos.  Occasionally, a Sophos employee will show up here, but 99% of the answers here come from other members like you.  If you have a suggestion for improvement, go to the Features site.

    For your current issue, I think you would be best served by opening a case with Sophos Support.  Please let us know the result of your case.

    Cheers - Bob

     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
Reply
  • Daniel, this isn't a venue to have conversations with Sophos.  Occasionally, a Sophos employee will show up here, but 99% of the answers here come from other members like you.  If you have a suggestion for improvement, go to the Features site.

    For your current issue, I think you would be best served by opening a case with Sophos Support.  Please let us know the result of your case.

    Cheers - Bob

     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
Children
No Data