XG115W - v20.0.2 MR-2 - Home
XG on VM 8 - v21 GA
If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.
I hate to resurrect a decade old thread, however have a question.
svens wrote: Transparent proxying is only done for port 80. (Since you don't know if the traffic on other ports is HTTP, you can't intercept it).
Is there a way to tell UTM that traffic on some other port (8080, 1234, 12345, etc.) is HTTP or HTTPS ? Technically, it should be possible, as there is no reason UTM can't interpret traffic on an arbitrary port as HTTP/HTTPS. 80 (or 443) is not some magic number.
Well, technically, these are magic numbers for the HTTP/S Proxy. [;)] 80 and 443 can't be changed inside the Transparent proxy. 12 years ago, the Transparent proxy didn't work with HTTPS (443).
When you use the Standard proxy, the usual port is 8080, but that can be changed on the 'Misc' tab of 'Web Filtering Options'. What is it that you want to accomplish?
Cheers - Bob
> Well, technically, these are magic numbers for the HTTP/S Proxy. [;)]
I'd say they may be hardcoded numbers but nothing about them is magic :)
> 80 and 443 can't be changed inside the Transparent proxy.
And I suppose no ports can be added ? Interesting that for the Standard proxy, I can add extra ports to the "Allowed target services" list (i.e. the default list contains a very much custom port 4444). But can't do the same for the transparent proxy.
> 12 years ago, the Transparent proxy didn't work with HTTPS (443).
Well, support for HTTPS required understanding of a brand new protocol. I'm talking about just inspecting a protocol the proxy already understands, but on a different port. Much easier and should be a matter of config change. I guess it's just not implemented, at least not in GUI.
> What is it that you want to accomplish?
I want to continue inspecting HTTP traffic using the transparent proxy with all its benefits (like not having to configure proxy settings on clients) while allowing my users to browse to a few sites that use port 8080 (i.e. http://hrits4.un.org:8080/Harassment). Don't tell me that no serious site should run on 8080, tell that to the UN :). Whitelisting these via firewall is something I really don't want to do.
After having been a programmer and managing very talented programmers, I can tell you that if this is a make-or-break requirement that you will never have this capability with the UTM. You could make a few adjustments with NAT rules, but there will never be a general solution for this. You might want to consider a different solution.
Cheers - Bob