Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 1864 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Red 10 behind Firewall Tunnel yes - Routing NO

m.semisch
Hi
I have to install a VPN-Connetion between 2 Subnets.

internet 

<>



internet 


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
  • 0
    Is your UTM with the RED the default Gw for subnet .1.0? Is your RED default gw for the Subnet .2.0? Which configuration you have selected for your RED?
  • 0
    You cannot create a manual route that supersedes routes created by WebAdmin for VPN and RED tunnels. 

    In this case, you should remove the RED for use elsewhere and just include the 192.168.2.0/24 subnet in the VPN tunnel. 

    Cheers - Bob

    Sorry for any short responses.  Posted from my iPhone.
     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
  • 0 in reply to K.N.
    Hi 
    I use the Tranparent/Split Mode and the Uplink is static!
    I use 2 Internet-Connections and i would use the static IP for routing from 192.168.2.0 to the 192.168.1.0 LAN.
    I have a Windows-DC, a SDSL and ADSL on both Places.  

    At home the red 10 works but there no Ping at Standart-Mode.
    What I have to do on the UTM for Routing like a Side-to-Side Connection?
Unfiltered HTML