This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

tunnel utm -> utm

I setup i red-connection between 2 utm 9 devices.
The status tells me that the connection is established but no traffic is go from or to the other network
In the red-log I see these lines:
2013:08:11-14:39:47 fw red_server[10798]: 7543d61167ee40f: PING remote_tx=61 local_rx=62 diff=-1
2013:08:11-14:39:47 fw red_server[10798]: 7543d61167ee40f: PONG local_tx=61
I have made firewall-rules to allow traffic between the networks.
I also made Masquerading rules on both sites for the other networks.
What am i doing wrong?

This thread was automatically locked due to age.

Parents

0 BAlfson over 11 years ago

You don't need Static Routes or Masquerading rules. As apijnappels sys, you can't have two interfaces defined in the same subnet. You should put the modem in bridged mode so that you can have a public IP on the UTM as you do in the other location.

All you need with the REDs is for RedBas to be 192.168.15.0/24 and redpieter to be 192.168.81.0/24 - similar to what you would do with an IPsec VPN.

Cheers - Bob

Sophos UTM Community Moderator
Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
Gold Solution Partner since 2005

MediaSoft, Inc. USA
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 maygyver over 11 years ago in reply to BAlfson

First, the two times 192.168.15.0 Network is not possible, please Change it.

Second. I think your Routing is wrong. Please post Interface and routing from Tools section.

Sven

Astaro user since 2001 - Astaro/Sophos Partner since 2008
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Reply

0 maygyver over 11 years ago in reply to BAlfson

First, the two times 192.168.15.0 Network is not possible, please Change it.

Second. I think your Routing is wrong. Please post Interface and routing from Tools section.

Sven

Astaro user since 2001 - Astaro/Sophos Partner since 2008
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Children

No Data