DNS queries for any .tk domain are blocked by IPS.

Hello Jeff,

if this is only one domainname, why not just add this domain to your internal DNS server?

Thanks for the suggestion but the IP address of that domain changes.

I tried opening www.dot.tk, resolved and opened just fine here.

I tried visiting www[.]dot[.]tk. It resolved and opened without any issues here.

I'm using utm as the dns server which resolves local requests and forwards unknowns to 1.1.1.1.

Jay Jay said:

I'm using utm as the dns server

Thanks Jay. Your setup is different than mine. The DNS queries from my Windows DNS server are being blocked by Sophos  IPS. DNS queries for .tk TLD are supposed to be blocked by Sophos IPS, by design. I'm just trying to come up with a way to "whitelist" a particular .tk domain rather than disabling all IPS for all DNS queries coming from my internal DNS server which is the only thing that works, so far. There still doesn't appear to be a way to do what I want. In that old thread, Bob had suggested adding an Advanced Threat exception but that seems to have had zero impact on my system.

Yes, but your Windows DNS has to query from somewhere - and that would be through the UTM, so an exception for the .tk should work that jp put above.  You could also modify that IPS exception with that second part in his screenshot, the pulldown menu that shows "going to these destinations" and modify that "coming from these networks", then including your LAN and/or External connections.

Forgive me if I'm just not understanding the suggestions each of you has made. I'm sorry but I don't know how to better explain this. The traffic (DNS query) TO the UTM is being blocked before we even need to be concerned about the suggested exceptions that allow traffic THROUGH the UTM.

The exception I listed (text) in my OP works. Here is a screen cap of it:

The problem with the exception above is that it exempts ALL DNS queries (coming from my internal DNS server) from IPS protection.

Neither of the two exceptions below work because traffic is blocked by IPS BEFORE either one would "kick in":

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As you can see, I do have a DNS host definition for www[.]dot[.]tk.

As a reminder, if any of you are actually testing these exceptions on your own network, don't forget to clear the IP address from the DNS host definition, clear the DNS query cache on the local/internal DNS server, PC and Sophos UTM else you may think an exception works when it really doesn't.

I'm still looking at the screenshots (that first one is bugging me that it doesn't make sense, but I have to think about that), but can you post the error in your log so I can read the IPS log for it being blocked please?

I have recently switched to XG and it's not blocked at least on that, lol.  I've never tried to go to a .tk domain on UTM.

IPS log entries:

2023:04:13-19:19:44 gateway snort[22267]: id="2101" severity="warn" sys="SecureNet" sub="ips" name="Intrusion protection alert" action="drop" reason="INDICATOR-COMPROMISE Suspicious .tk dns query" group="241" srcip="192.168.0.2" dstip="192.168.0.1" proto="17" srcport="49684" dstport="53" sid="39867" class="Misc activity" priority="3" generator="1" msgid="0"
2023:04:13-19:19:50 gateway snort[22267]: id="2101" severity="warn" sys="SecureNet" sub="ips" name="Intrusion protection alert" action="drop" reason="INDICATOR-COMPROMISE Suspicious .tk dns query" group="241" srcip="192.168.0.2" dstip="192.168.0.1" proto="17" srcport="64932" dstport="53" sid="39867" class="Misc activity" priority="3" generator="1" msgid="0"

sid="39867"

Have you tried to just disable that Snort rule?

Yes. It works but I was wanting to whitelist only one particular .tk domain which still doesn't seem possible.

Disabling that Snort rule allows all .tk DNS queries to pass through which is better than exempting all DNS queries from IPS protection with an IPS exception.

I guess this is as close as I'm going to get to being able to whitelist a single domain lookup.

Off topic: How bumpy was that transition to XG? I guess we'll all have to make that move sooner or later or go to one of the *Sense's or Untangle.

One would think selecting the option to disable IPS for a given domain (to/from/both), would disable all rules for that domain.... Who would of thunk!

I'm in the planning stages of prepping to move to pfsense.  Exciting times ahead.

One would think selecting the option to disable IPS for a given domain (to/from/both), would disable all rules for that domain.... Who would of thunk!

I'm in the planning stages of prepping to move to pfsense.  Exciting times ahead.