Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 27 replies
  • Subscribers 3 subscribers
  • Views 30052 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Multipath Rules vs Static Routing (Policy Routes) ?

UweT
Dear Experts,

We have 3x Internet access lines using Uplink Balancing.

We are using services for online file storage accessed by WebDAV (HTTPS) mostly.

I want do force all the traffic on HTTPS to destination i.e. "PROVIDER.com" to go over our dedicated line (same upload and download), let's call it "line1".

What is the best strategy in performance regarding the Astaro overload? And what is the difference in between?:

a) using Interfaces&Routing > Static Routing > Policy Rules (Any>Any>HTTPS>provider.com>interface "line1")

or

b) using Interfaces&Routing > Interfaces > Multipath Rules (Any>HTTPS>provider.com>line1)

Thank you in advance!
Uwe


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    Is there anyone that has some insight here?  Every system I've ever worked with automatically invalidates routes that are no longer possible (i.e. if the associated interface goes down).  Does UTM not do that?  How can we achieve proper failover and traffic routing, including for RED tunnels?
Reply
  • 0
    Is there anyone that has some insight here?  Every system I've ever worked with automatically invalidates routes that are no longer possible (i.e. if the associated interface goes down).  Does UTM not do that?  How can we achieve proper failover and traffic routing, including for RED tunnels?
Children
No Data
Unfiltered HTML