Thread Info
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 5 replies
  • Subscribers 5 subscribers
  • Views 6364 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Which is considered more stable 9.356-3 or 9.404-5?

StuartBryson

We are currently v9.320-2 deployed on all hardware/virtual appliances, and this is working fine. We just purchased some new hardware appliances and considering upgrading to 9.4 before deployment. Which is the most stable patch to upgrade to atm? 9.356-3 or 9.404-5?

For existing 9.320 installs; would it be recommended to upgrade straight to 9.4 or should I leapfrog to 9.35 than to 9.4

Thanks



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents

  • Hi, Stuart, and welcome to the UTM Community!

    Depending on what you're using (IPsec site-to-site, RED 15, etc., etc.), there are reasons to do 9.356 and reasons to go to 9.404.  Your best bet is to read the release notes for each and to search here for issues associated with either one.  I've kept a couple of clients on 9.3, but most now are on 9.4.

    Cheers - Bob

     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
  • in reply to BAlfson

    Thanks for the reply everyone.

    BAlfson said:
    Depending on what you're using (IPsec site-to-site, RED 15, etc., etc.), there are reasons to do 9.356 and reasons to go to 9.404

    We are looking for the most stable. 9.4 brings sandstorm which is something we would consider using at head office but stability over all.

    We use 90% of the features in 9.3. Mainly not RED or Wireless Security. These are handled by S2S and a separate controller for wireless.

    Also is 9.4 currently supported in SUM?

    apijnappels said:
    I have all UTM's now at 9.404-5 and they are working without problems for these environments.

    That is good to know. TY

Reply
  • in reply to BAlfson

    Thanks for the reply everyone.

    BAlfson said:
    Depending on what you're using (IPsec site-to-site, RED 15, etc., etc.), there are reasons to do 9.356 and reasons to go to 9.404

    We are looking for the most stable. 9.4 brings sandstorm which is something we would consider using at head office but stability over all.

    We use 90% of the features in 9.3. Mainly not RED or Wireless Security. These are handled by S2S and a separate controller for wireless.

    Also is 9.4 currently supported in SUM?

    apijnappels said:
    I have all UTM's now at 9.404-5 and they are working without problems for these environments.

    That is good to know. TY

Children
Unfiltered HTML