SG 310(firmware 9.355-1) between a cisco switch 2960(vlan801) and cisco router 2911 (2911 connected to 2960 on WAN connection). No internet - nothing works

Hi, and welcome to the UTM Community!

Agreed with Dlabun.  Then again, to which "Sophos techs" are you referring?

Cheers - Bob

BALfson;

I am referring to Sophos UTM support: https://doc.sophos.com/support/help/en-us/contact/index.html 

I think you have to start from scratch here. The 2960 obviously has an ip address on vlan ? If you plug that into the UTM, can it be pinged?

I've got 6 2960's plugged into 2 UTM's and they work. The ports on the switches are set to trunk mode.

Bob,

Thanks

Not sure how to disable the wireless protection when I do not have to license for it.  Do I need to go into the shell and do it? what is the command for that?

Well this whole site works under vlan 801, if I switch Vlans then the switch 2960 loses connection to my cisco router 2911.

Any other suggestion? is welcome.

Louis-M,

This is funny believe me I have started many times from the scratch. 

2960 has the IP on vlan 801 which is 10.10.11.252.  The switch only pings the UTM if the bridge br0 has any IP, so I assign an IP on the bridge 10.10.11.4 to make the switch 2960 ping this UTM at 10.10.11.4.  Then I assign on the UTM the IP to the Vlan 801 as 10.10.11.5.  Then I put the wan into the UTM and the LAN to my switch............No internet. 

If I remove the IP from the bridge and make it 0.0.0.0./0. then there is no more pinging from the switch to the UTM.  Though it should ping the VLan 801 ip 10.10.11.5, but no luck.

Well here is my config from port 48 which is in trunk on the switch:

Bur_Camp_Cisco2960#show interfaces trunk

Port        Mode             Encapsulation  Status        Native vlan
Gi0/48      auto             802.1q         trunking      1

Port        Vlans allowed on trunk
Gi0/48      1-4094

Port        Vlans allowed and active in management domain
Gi0/48      1,92,420,425,801

Port        Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
Gi0/48      1,92,420,425,801

I will try one more time, but I am sure I have already tested this connection as well.

I have checked with a BRAND NEW CISCO switch catalyst 2940 and UTM did the same thing 'NO internet' .  Either some routing path need to be set on UTM or UTM itself has some hardware/protocol adjustment.  Not sure.

I am going to try now with a layer 3 switch.  Just in the process of getting one as these switches cost a fortune.  We have already spend a fortune buying this UTM at around $10K and now to make it happy need to topple the whole network infrastructure by buying more devices......Funny.

How precious are you about the lan subnet on the right hand side?

Just as a test, set the UTM up without bridging so the 801 vlan becomes the WAN of the UTM. Have a totally different LAN subnet and use natting etc ie bog standard setup for the UTM. Test a ping from the UTM WAN to the Cisco from there to see if that works. The test from the LAN to see if you can reach the Cisco 2911.

I have:

LAN >>> 2x 3750 >>> 2x UTM SG310 >>> 2x 2960s >>> Internet so they do work. I can only think it's something to do with the bridging on the UTM as I've never set this up.

But where 802.1q vlan's are involved on the UTM, the interfaces must be configure with ethernet vlan type (not just ethernet) and the Cisco's must have trunk set on the interfaces that connect to the UTM.

If you are just using ethernet on the UTM, then it is sufficient to have switchport mode access on the Cisco's.

Ok here is I can try:

- On my UTM I will assign Ethernet Vlan 801 to eth1 WAN port, assign it IP 10.10.11.4 (not sure to assign Proxy ARP or enable spanning tree protocol?) connect it to internet cable coming from my router cisco 2911.

-On my UTM I will assign Ethernet Vlan 801 to eth 0 LAN port, assign it IP 192.168.0.5 (not sure to assign Proxy ARP or enable spanning tree protocol?), connect it to port 48 on my Cisco 2960 which is in trunk and allowing all Vlans.  Here I have to also allow 192.168.0.0/24 to my DHCP scope.  I am sure I have to change the IP of vlan 801 on my cisco 2960?.  This is you want me to check?

Thanks

Yes give that a shot. Make a different vlan for the LAN side eg vlan 899 or something and then find a free port on the 2960s and do a switchport mode access and switchport access vlan 899. Plug a laptop a laptop/pc into that and if alls well, you should get an ip from the dhcp server you have configured for that vlan 899 ie a LAN ip address eg 192.168.0.100/24

You can configure this yourself or do a reset and I think the UTM might go through a wizard

So:

UTM:

WAN = vlan 801 (select vlan ethernet type). Don't forget gateway here which is your Cisco 2911 ip
LAN = vlan 899 (select vlan ethernet type)   >>> leave in port 48 2960s. You will need to configure DHCP, firewall rules to let traffic through etc

2960:

leave UTM connected to port 48. create another vlan 899 and another port with that vlan assigned in access mode to vlan 899

- Ran default setup with WAN under VLAN 801 10.10.11.5/24  ............no luck, LAN 10.10.12.0/24 No luck on internet.  Tried putting LAN as well under 801, still no luck  Made a management interface, From tools I was able to ping my cisco router, and outside 8.8.8.8
but not internally to any of my Domain controllers.  So no internet.

-Kept on checking the firewall logs and it simply DROPs TCP, ICMP, SMTP etc.

I give up on this UTM. 

Also now I have no assurance that it will work once I have a layer 3 switch.

Ok, we have a start.

You have a successful WAN as you can ping the Cisco router.

You now need to concentrate on the LAN side. If you configured the LAN as we mentioned above, can you get a ping from the laptop or pc connected to the vlan that the LAN is on? Once we've confirmed that, we can start on the next step ie routing, nat & firewall rules.

Louis,

You seem like a warrior, not giving up on this as yet?

The same behavior this UTM offered under the bridge, WAN connection exist but no connection between the UTM and the Cisco 2960 switch.

 In any case I was driving myself too deep into it, and changed something.  I guess I have to start all over again.  One thing I observed on the LAN connection, unless the LAN has an IP from the same subnet under which the switch operates (10.10.11.0/24) UTM loses connection and also if the simple Ethernet is used it also loses connection.  I guess I was at a stage where it started to ping the router from WAN like:

UTM has 10.10.11.5/24 with DG set (this interface is VLAN 801 Ethernet. 

UTM has 10.10.12.4/24 with no DG set (this interface is VLAN 801) Ethernet? 

With Continuous disconnections on the internet and testing so many times the users are getting frustrated.  I guess I leave testing till Monday.  Will start fresh again.

Gentlemen,

Finally after approx. 3months.  Today I got a test layer3 switch Brocade ICX 6610.  The moment the switch was installed with the same config as (Cisco 2960) things started to work without any trouble.  The network got the internet once this switch was installed behind SG 310.  Sophos did not suggest that under my scenario we would require a layer 3 switch.  Though the case went till the global support.

I am pretty happy on all the things working after such a long time, but still we have to pay extra on top of buying SG310 and that is the layer 3 switch. :)

Gentlemen,

Finally after approx. 3months.  Today I got a test layer3 switch Brocade ICX 6610.  The moment the switch was installed with the same config as (Cisco 2960) things started to work without any trouble.  The network got the internet once this switch was installed behind SG 310.  Sophos did not suggest that under my scenario we would require a layer 3 switch.  Though the case went till the global support.

I am pretty happy on all the things working after such a long time, but still we have to pay extra on top of buying SG310 and that is the layer 3 switch. :)

Sorry, I'd forgotten all about this. I'm not sure why a L3 switch with the same config as a L2 Switch (2960) would have any effect.

Although you can get a 2960 with lite layer 3 options although most would use this and get a full layer 3 switch eg 3750 etc

Glad you've got it going but I'm still at a loss as to how it works