If I would have known that, I´d never created such a setup with ranges. Today the support told me this problems are just in relation of usage in the webproxy module and are not supported. haha... in 9.2 I started using this objects like other objects. Webadmin didn´t told me not to do it. I think that´s not documented anywhere....
Yes I also hope, that they will change their priorization from implementing more and more new features to stabilize the current code....
If I would have known that, I´d never created such a setup with ranges. Today the support told me this problems are just in relation of usage in the webproxy module and are not supported. haha... in 9.2 I started using this objects like other objects. Webadmin didn´t told me not to do it. I think that´s not documented anywhere.... Yes I also hope, that they will change their priorization from implementing more and more new features to stabilize the current code....
This keeps getting better, customer threw a UTM120 in my head today (ouch!) replaced with Cisco, they where tired of the bugs, new and old. Sophos UTM is out for good there now [:(] Sent from my iPhone using Astaro.org
If I would have known that, I´d never created such a setup with ranges. Today the support told me this problems are just in relation of usage in the webproxy module and are not supported. haha... in 9.2 I started using this objects like other objects. Webadmin didn´t told me not to do it. I think that´s not documented anywhere.... Yes I also hope, that they will change their priorization from implementing more and more new features to stabilize the current code....
This keeps getting better, customer threw a UTM120 in my head today (ouch!) replaced with Cisco, they where tired of the bugs, new and old. Sophos UTM is out for good there now [:(] Sent from my iPhone using Astaro.org
