Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 52 replies
  • Subscribers 4 subscribers
  • Views 429450 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

9.308-16 Released to GA

BrucekConvergent
UTM Version 9.308 is now officially released:

UTM Up2Date 9.308 Released | Sophos Blog


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    Another Bug:

    after reordering our Interfaces, our Mailserver got out via the wrong IP via SMTP. (and gotten lots of missing reverse DNS Error replys)
    We have a Multipath rule that says that our Mailserver should go over a specific IP, but it didn't apply. [:(]

    EDIT: think its based on our faulty multipath rule since we are using the sophos smtp proxy and i changed it to source: any. will test as soon as i can.
  • 0 in reply to ben83
    Hi Ben,

    in your case, you would need an SNAT rule, so that all smtp traffic is sent with the specific uplink interface.

    Or you could update your DNS records, so that rDNS resolves correctly and you still have the advantage of multipathing and uplink-ha.
Reply
  • 0 in reply to ben83
    Hi Ben,

    in your case, you would need an SNAT rule, so that all smtp traffic is sent with the specific uplink interface.

    Or you could update your DNS records, so that rDNS resolves correctly and you still have the advantage of multipathing and uplink-ha.
Children
No Data
Unfiltered HTML