Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 7 subscribers
  • Views 978 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

SG 125 to SG 220

SGICT

Hi

I have a customer who wants to upgrade from SG125 to SG220. If I recall rightly, many years ago you could simply backup the existing UTM and restore on another one that's bigger. What you couldn't do is backup a bigger UTM and restore on a smaller due to less physical ports.

Is that still the case?

Thanks in advance, hopefully this will save me hours of work



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0

    Booth directions are possible.

    If you go to a device with less ports, the interfaces are not assigned to hardware afterwards.

    (I do this way too)

    I have assigned some interfaces to one physical with VLAN's afterwards.

     

    You have to install a new license after installing a backup to a different device type.

     


    Dirk

    Systema Gesellschaft für angewandte Datentechnik mbH  // Sophos Platinum Partner
    Sophos Solution Partner since 2003
    If a post solves your question, click the 'Verify Answer' link at this post.

  • 0 in reply to dirkkotte

    Thanks for your reply, I never knew/tried downgrading but that's great to know.

     

    So basically get both the live and new UTM up to date with firmware, take a backup of live, restore on the new and upload the new license after the restore and that's it?

Reply
  • 0 in reply to dirkkotte

    Thanks for your reply, I never knew/tried downgrading but that's great to know.

     

    So basically get both the live and new UTM up to date with firmware, take a backup of live, restore on the new and upload the new license after the restore and that's it?

Children
  • 0 in reply to SGICT

    Exactly, that's how I would do it, too.

    I would check the physical interface(s) that have been assigned to your logical interface names, because a different hardware may have other odering scheme, which could lead to confusion and/or changed associations on the target hardware.

    Mit freundlichem Gruß, best regards from Germany,

    Philipp Rusch

    New Vision GmbH, Germany
    Sophos Silver-Partner

    If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.

Unfiltered HTML