Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 11 replies
  • Subscribers 10 subscribers
  • Views 19233 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Gigabit Internet and Sophos - a losing combination

BJohnson

For the record, this is false advertising:

So now I've got to build my own box, and my only Sophos-approved point of reference is a hardware compatibility PDF that was last updated in Sept 2015.  The alternative I'm looking at is the SG 210 rev.3, and I'll be paying well over $1k for a device with a 2-core, 2-thread, 2 1/2 year-old $40 CPU.  What am I supposed to do?



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0

    Douglas, thank you for the detailed reply. It will be helpful to many people, but I am already aware of the issues you raised.

    I have a symmetrical Gbps fiber connection.  The worst iperf test results were 931 down / 940 up.  One of the iperf tests came back at 960/1011.  My target was 940 Mbps, so the circuit is good.

    I understand that the UTM has some overhead too, that's why I'm building my own box.

Reply
  • 0

    Douglas, thank you for the detailed reply. It will be helpful to many people, but I am already aware of the issues you raised.

    I have a symmetrical Gbps fiber connection.  The worst iperf test results were 931 down / 940 up.  One of the iperf tests came back at 960/1011.  My target was 940 Mbps, so the circuit is good.

    I understand that the UTM has some overhead too, that's why I'm building my own box.

Children
No Data
Unfiltered HTML