This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Is a limit of 50 IP addresses still realistic for home use?

I've recently started using a UTM 9 home license on a small firewall appliance (Intel J1900-based). It's working well, and I'm definitely a fan. However, I'm immediately running into the 50 'user' (really IP address) limit.

We're a typical family of three, admittedly a gadget-heavy household, but not ridiculously so. I expect that's likely to be a common trait of anyone sophisticated enough to want to run Sophos UTM 9 at home.

In short, I've exceeded the 50 IP limit by over 10% without even trying. Which surprised me at first, when I started counting the devices I've added to my network over the past few years, sure enough, the count was correct. For example: three eero WiFi units, 5 small 'web smart' network switches (i.e. each has a web interface), A/V receiver, four DVRs, two HDHomeRun Prime network tuners, two smart TVs, a Sonos system, a printer and an all-in-one, standalone doc scanner, two Nest thermostats, the main '24x7' Linux server, plus a small Synology and Qnap NAS, Xbox 360, nVidia Shield TV, security camera, sprinkler controller, SmartThings Hub, Roomba ...that's 32 IP addresses, before we even start talking about laptops, tablets, smartphones, kindles, etc. Even my Smartwatch requests an IP address...

As I understand it, the Home license allows 50 IP addresses, period. The only way past that limit is to purchase a commercial license, whose costs runs to four digits for even a subset of the functionality provided in the home license. If that understanding is correct, either I have to work around this limit by putting some devices on a NAT'd subnet (which seems counter to the spirit of the license), or give up and go elsewhere. Which would be a shame, the only other negative I've come across is the complete lack of UPnP port forwarding (yes, I fully understand the controversy - but believe it's a solvable problem).

I see the value being offered, and would happily pay to increase that limit to 100 or 150 IP addresses (say $99 or $149?). I'd rather not pay a subscription personally, unless it's significantly less per year. But I don't have either option, it seems.

Thoughts?

- Paul



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • The UTM just counts directly connected IPs (Interface Subnet). Just use one of your smart switches as router before the UTM and you may connect as much devices as you want to your router...

    BR, Erwin

  • Indeed. I had run out of IP addresses as I had loads of Alexas and smart home devices on Wi-Fi. I added a Ubiquiti USG (well I added a Dreammachine Pro) and that simply looks after the Wi-Fi, and is then connected to a (WiFi only) network interface on my PC-running-Sophos machine

    Sophos only counts the Ubquiti network as 1 single IP, plus I block traffic so the WiFi network cannot see the in-house hardwired connections for security purposes

    So my useage count has gone from 55+ to just 16

Reply
  • Indeed. I had run out of IP addresses as I had loads of Alexas and smart home devices on Wi-Fi. I added a Ubiquiti USG (well I added a Dreammachine Pro) and that simply looks after the Wi-Fi, and is then connected to a (WiFi only) network interface on my PC-running-Sophos machine

    Sophos only counts the Ubquiti network as 1 single IP, plus I block traffic so the WiFi network cannot see the in-house hardwired connections for security purposes

    So my useage count has gone from 55+ to just 16

Children
No Data