Important note about SSL VPN compatibility for 20.0 MR1 with EoL SFOS versions and UTM9 OS. Learn more in the release notes.

Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 39 subscribers
  • Views 7973 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Create group with LDAP custom attribute

bitiai

UTM 9 is easier to create a group based on LDAP attribute. In XG via Configure> Authentication> Group> Add Members we did not find it.



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0

    Hi and Welcome to Sophos Community,

    I believe that you have taken a look into the KBA referred below:

    https://community.sophos.com/kb/en-us/123163

    To import groups and member on the XG the user has to authenticate initially which was create a User object with the Group association in the XG> User list. Alongside, you can also raise it as an idea to change the UI functionality here.

    Thanks

    Sachin Gurung
    Team Lead | Sophos Technical Support
    Knowledge Base  |  @SophosSupport  |  Video tutorials
    Remember to like a post.  If a post (on a question thread) solves your question use the 'This helped me' link.

  • 0 in reply to sachingurung

    Hello sachingurung, 

     

    I'm sorry, but an "idea" how is connect XG to MS Active Directory for me (with all respect to XG developers ) compared to the implementation in the UTM v9.x seems utterly stupid and useless. 

    To this day I did not understand what the most important benefit has the XG connection to a MS Active Directory compared to the implementation in the UTM v9.x.

     

    Please can someone describe for me the major advantage, why is the XG connection to a MS Active Directory implemented by this way ? 

    I really do not see any advantage ....

    alda

Reply
  • 0 in reply to sachingurung

    Hello sachingurung, 

     

    I'm sorry, but an "idea" how is connect XG to MS Active Directory for me (with all respect to XG developers ) compared to the implementation in the UTM v9.x seems utterly stupid and useless. 

    To this day I did not understand what the most important benefit has the XG connection to a MS Active Directory compared to the implementation in the UTM v9.x.

     

    Please can someone describe for me the major advantage, why is the XG connection to a MS Active Directory implemented by this way ? 

    I really do not see any advantage ....

    alda

Children
No Data
Unfiltered HTML