Important note about SSL VPN compatibility for 20.0 MR1 with EoL SFOS versions and UTM9 OS. Learn more in the release notes.

This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Best choice for link quality

Hey guys.

I wanted to understand how to better treat the SLA and the health check.

My doubts:

1 - When I select custom SLA, the percentage specified in "maximum lost packet" is based on the "Example size for SLA" right?

2 - If I have packet loss reaching the metric defined in my SLA. It deactivates the link regardless of the "health check" action of "deactivate the gateway after" x consecutive times, right?

3 - The values in "maximum lost packet" in SLA and "deactivate gateway after" do you need to be careful? Any ideal value?
Example: if there is a value of 10% loss of an example of 30 and action of deactivating the gateway after 1 consecutive failure. The link presents oscillations, varying some packet losses, so the action will be to deactivate and return after 3 successes. If we are using this link will we notice the flaws and it will never be replaced?

4 - SLA sees the amount of packet lost in general. Whether it is a consecutive loss or not, it is within the loss metric it changes. Right?

5 - Are the graphs always created based on the example or is it for each packet triggered?

Thank you for the patience.



This thread was automatically locked due to age.