This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Data Control Not Working

Is anyone else experiencing issues with Data Control policies not working ? During an external audit, we discovered both ssn and credit card numbers were able to bypass the policies we had set in place. These policies had worked before. Now, I get to pull all emails matching the polices via Exchange. We have bank account policies that we will test next. We called Sophos, and they are going to investigate. 

 

Software engine v4.5.0.1
Threat definitions 558000.0.20190222.156


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • Hi,

    Its important to note that all DLP rules have a certain set of criteria that must be met to count against the qty total.  The other thing that is important is that the quantity is set to the defaults.  For example setting a quantity to low will generally result in a lot of pf, and one set to high may not be effective.

    one thing you may wish to to for testing is:

    click on the rule in question.

    under rule type, check off advanced options

    under rule config, there are several tabs.. click on the logging tab

    check off all 3 boxes

    apply/save

     

    the change will take upto 10 mins to take effect, once it does send a test email

    under the search tool, select mail logs

    locate your email (maybe by subject or what not)

    left click on it.

    scroll down until you see, view log details

    you should then see a new tab called logging with all of the hits listed

     

    important notes:

    always use country specific vs international  .. so if your looking for north american credit cards, select US and Canada not international.

    1 match means 1 instance of every required piece of information

    for example if phi means .. first last and middle name, all 3 names must match to equal 1 hit

    DLP rules are generally meant to help stop large scale leakage, they should not be relied upon to catch a single instance (unless the default quantity of the rule is 1)

     

    the "hits" may also be of use if you have opened a support case.

  • Hey RW,

     

    I wanted to give you an update on this. So, the offending messages were not being stopped because the quantity was set to 10. We changed this to 1 and the additional actions of the rule were triggered, but not the main action. The support folks are trying to figure out why the main trigger is not working. To clarify for those following this discussion, we adjusted for the specific rule the quantity from 10 to 1:

    * From RW: DLP rules are generally meant to help stop large scale leakage, they should not be relied upon to catch a single instance (unless the default quantity of the rule is 1)

     

    Screenshot sample below.

     

     

Reply
  • Hey RW,

     

    I wanted to give you an update on this. So, the offending messages were not being stopped because the quantity was set to 10. We changed this to 1 and the additional actions of the rule were triggered, but not the main action. The support folks are trying to figure out why the main trigger is not working. To clarify for those following this discussion, we adjusted for the specific rule the quantity from 10 to 1:

    * From RW: DLP rules are generally meant to help stop large scale leakage, they should not be relied upon to catch a single instance (unless the default quantity of the rule is 1)

     

    Screenshot sample below.

     

     

Children
No Data